• Grapho@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Less genocide, but not the stopping of genocide? Man, do I not feel sorry for gringos when they act like this is a moral choice.

    How would you know, anyway? They refused to acknowledge there was a genocide in the first place while they sent a record amount of money and weapons. Oh wow, such harm reduction.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      No genocide > less genocide > more genocide. No genocide was not on the ballot; the choices were less and more. Reread the last sentence of the comment you replied to. I guess you’re right though, the Democrats could have started a genocide against the American Latino population. I guess there’s no way to know which option was less harmful