He’s literally calling for discipline, not to stop protesting. A small minority of people were being violent. I think you’re looking for things to be upset about.
“we need to succeed” does not imply previous failure or success. You’re assuming it implies failure. That’s a choice of translation that you’re making and I disagree with it.
I think because there are calls for violent resistance too and even if it is non violent now he is reminding people to keep their chill in the future when things can get more heated
He’s literally calling for discipline, not to stop protesting. A small minority of people were being violent. I think you’re looking for things to be upset about.
No he is implying that the protests are violent and amplifying a false narratieve.
I don’t read it that way
So why is he calling for non violence at non violent protests?
To remind people to not be violent when they protest.
And because the government is trying to provoke them into violence. It’s the hardest thing in the world to resist the urge to respond in kind.
Is he saying they are currently not violent?
He’s not saying anything about the current situation, he is just reminding people to pursue a non-violent strategy in the face of violent oppression.
YOU have a bias that you want to confirm, and nobody is going along with your propaganda.
Is he saying they currently are violent?
You’re so happy to imply one side but not imply the other. That’s a you problem.
Why would the other side need to be implied?
You should not swear at people. It does not help in discussions.
“we need to succeed” does not imply previous failure or success. You’re assuming it implies failure. That’s a choice of translation that you’re making and I disagree with it.
What in the actual fuck are you talking about?
Go away.
Where is the swearing?
I think because there are calls for violent resistance too and even if it is non violent now he is reminding people to keep their chill in the future when things can get more heated