… because I point out that people who purity test themselves out of cooperating with potential allies over when minimal effort is required on their part will do the same thing when major effort is required on their part?

No, because binary categories themselves are what stop insufficiently-motivated liberals like yourself from doing the right thing at all. You’re the one trying to shove activists into a box and calling them right-wingers. The only one advocating for a purity test is you LMFAO. The lack of self-awareness is fucking incredible.

Which is why he made sure to oppose LBJ, right?

Only because he was already amicable to his cause. You think the democrats deserve the same charitability when they’ve roundly rejected ours? Besides, if they deserved any leeway previously when they were in power, they sure as fuck don’t deserve it now

Ironic, considering that MLK, a socialist, worked with LBJ, despite the Dems being much more gruesome and despicable then.

He worked with people who were willing to work with him - democrats are far less willing to negotiate than LBJ ever was. Maybe the next lot will be more sensible.

Already pointed out that criticism of the Dems isn’t what’s being criticized here, but whatever you need to confirm the paranoia that I’m a Fed or a warhawk or whatever it is that you’ve got going on.

I don’t think you are a fed, just that you’re the most thumb-sounding self-described ‘leftist’ I’ve ever seen on lemmy. And no, not ‘criticism of dems’, just criticism directed at the dems that also apply to republicans, because that’s apparently not very fair to your feelings.