• peregrin5@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    So you go into a conversation about a modern topic where the modern definition of terms is a particular thing, and then you said “well ackshually the definition of this in 1780 was this so you’re wrong”.

    I don’t think anyone cares what the definition of left and right are in 1780s France and it has no bearing on a modern discussion of these terms.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The point I’m making is that the trough line has always been, Right-wing concentrated power, Left-wing distributed power.

      The fact that certain dictators have pretended to be left-wing, and right-wing jackasses have gone along with it, is where the deliberate confusion was introduced.

      Communism as proposed by Marx is a true leftwing ideology, the Totalitarian dictatorship created by Lenin was communist in name only, it had more in common with Feudalism than communism. Mao was just as bad. An out of touch dictator who told farmers to plant their seeds several feet underground, and when that obviously failed, feasted while they starved.

      That doesn’t seem anything like what Marx wrote about, or rather it was disturbingly similar to what Marx wrote about capitalism.

      But again, right-wingers love to confuse the issue, because it turns out kings are not popular, so you have to lie to get people to bow before one.