• khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Lost tourist revenue from that would surely be enormous.

    Edit: apparently not. Wikipedia says:

    Operating costs still remain one of its biggest challenges today.

    • Branch_Ranch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yea, it was shut down because it was too expensive to run. Republicans now: “as long as the undesirables are locked up, lets do it.”

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh wow. Didn’t know it had shut down. Guess I’m in the lucky gang to have seen it while it was still a tourist attraction. Definitely one of the cooler things I saw in the US.

        I’m surprised it wasn’t making money. It was very busy when I was there which was in September (1998 iirc).

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          the news this morning said it attracted “about a million visitors per year”. in SF? that’s crazy low.

          • khannie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s about 300+ visitors per hour averaged out over the whole year given opening times / holidays. It’s a small assed island that requires a ferry to get to so honestly not bad. IMO.

            It’s also very very far from Europe where I guess a decent chunk of US visitors come from.

          • khannie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Oh I meant as a tourist attraction :) last time I was in SF was 2019 and and it was still open to the public. I misunderstood your comment