0. Paper cheques was a close one, but I actually paid a house once with a cheque. And the local video rental wasn’t called Blockbusters, obviously.

If cars are better than horses, why do horses still exist? Checkmate evolutionist

Those are war corgis.

Be a normal person around them without trying anything. If they like you, you’ll notice it.

… usually randomly 5 years afterward.

A bitch to remember compared to the bypassnro though.

Well, who cares. I’m never installing Windows again anyway.

Lol I sold mine in January. I’m fucking Warren Buffet.

I’m a pen/pencil freak who’s spent an amazing amount of money on them, and I’d choose 2.

If I own my home via mortgage and I’m paying way above interest, am I considered living from “paycheck to paycheck”?

Noticed the other day that Zuckerberg was in my Mastodon feed. First I thought it was a parody account, but after staring at the profile for a while, it started to look like @[email protected] might actually be the bastard himself.

So any Mastodon users might want to consider blocking the threads.net domain.

Where, though? Moon?

Yeap. Too late to sell now.

Arr, matey.

Removed by mod

At this point, even if not optimal, I’m not actually entirely against Hamas doing that.

But again, the same thing applies to attacks against civilians. It rarely works in any strategic sense.

Let’s not pretend as if anyone here can know the real answer to that. But… Kyiv has been attacked with terror attacks since the start of this war, so why not Moscow? Perhaps it might bring some sense to the russian people who are currently complete sheeps when it comes to their leadership.

Unfortunately(?) attacks against civilians rarely work in lowering morale.

Why would they want peace talks between Trump and Putin to succeed? That’s like wishing that peace talks between Hitler and Stalin went great.

deleted by creator

Finland’s territorial security has been constantly threatened by Soviet Union and Russia since WW2. Does that give us the right to bomb their civilians, or do only big countries with nuclear weapons get to use this logic?

Otoh, I totally get that in 2025 only big countries with nuclear weapons have any say in geopolitics. It didn’t use to be that way and I wonder greatly about people who think this is a good change.

Removed by mod

Bonjour.