plz1

This type of ad is meant to stir up the racism. Basically, remind the boomers to vote with their racism, not their brains.

I haven’t seen the ad, but I assume it is not depicting him as his 10 year-old self, at the time of 9/11.

The obvious response is running ads with Cuomo + Epstein, right? I don’t even know if that’s a thing, but it wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest if Cuomo had ties to that circle.

Yeah, I misread, sorry. Some day, I hope, some day.

This phone is running Android…

Explosives

I mean, if the red light is all you get, you can’t consent without already being recorded. You can’t see the light without being re4cordd, so you haven’t provided consent. I’m totally OK with consent revocation being a nice punch in the face to those wearing these surveillance devices.

I don’t drink sugarized soda, but I lump Fresca into the soda category.

I don’t want to go down the rabbit hole, but I’m wondering is this ia CA paying the difference on what would be price gouging, or CA actually controlling the process, to erase any opportunity for that price gouging. That latter would likely be permanent, the former would last only as long as the administration isn’t seeking budget cuts.

Apple and Google should just prevent their app stores from functioning in Texas. This crap is getting absurd. Cause a few riots from citizens when all their apps stop working, or it’ll only get worse.

I thought Google’s plans to kill AOSP effectively put a nail in Graphene’s coffin?

Obligatory “what are you doing, stepson?” here…

I’ll see myself out

The fact that these photos and PII (personally identifiable information) were not destroyed after the verification process was certified is absolutely atrocious OpSec. I don’t even care which of the two companies is ultimately responsible, because they are both responsible.

1. Zendesk for their bad OpSec
2. Discord for both outsourcing this AND not having contractual requirements to properly secure and destroy PII when it was no longer required.

I work in IT, and treat PII like it’s dangerously radioactive, because in the digital world, it really is.

Good choice

You CAN use it to interact with people without them knowing your number. The only current requirement is specific to registration.

The CEO is saying they are willing to, that should be taken seriously.

That makes the assumption you want to use your phone number at all. And I’m sure the overhead of encryption would break SMS due to the limits on character counts.

AIPAC bribes campaign contributions intensify

That means nothing when the servers stop taking EU traffic. I get your point, but the real solution here is putting a bullet (double tap) in Chat Control, once and for all.

Why not just make it a website? We’re not doing censoring yet, right?

This section is almost worthless. It’s wholly reliant on the app developer self-reporting accurately, and honestly. We know how effective self-regulation is…

Just assume ALL apps are data harvesting, and take measures to block or sabotage that.

It’d be funny if all the big tech Seattle-area HQ’s moved to Vancouver just due to this.