But in reality, there’s no actual evidence of that, or that it was/is ever even possible.

Someone else said it came from Italy. Is the origin hazy, or rid it get to the Nazis through Italy?

How does it work after the API butchering?

I don’t think there’s any filtering going on at this stage.

I imagine it’s still in the training phase. It’ll look at who gets selected vs. who gets left, and learns about what kind of resumes the hiring team tends to prefer.

It’ll also probably be comparing the success of who opts into tracking vs. who declines.

I could also see it following along later – did this employee meet expectations? Did they quit early? Did they get fired? Etc.

It’s likely not going to impact OP, but it will likely mean that AI will be able to be as bad at making decisions as whomever sorts through them! Lol

(Not a dig at any position or role…resumes and interviews are generally not a good assessment of competency for most jobs)

Elon Musk is technology because he’s powered by AI (but without the dataset to back it)

What made you buy your monitor?

Having a monitor at all has plenty of killer apps: Anything that it displays that you want to use that you wouldn’t be able to do otherwise without a monitor.

But your particular monitor? Well, it looks like the Apple VR thing is about 10x to 20x the price of a basic VR headset. Is your particular monitor 10x to 20x the cost of a regular monitor? If so, there probably is some killer app that made you get a fancy monitor. And maybe it’s something that no other monitor can do… otherwise, why spend 10x to 20x as much?

If the Apple VR thing also has a computer built in (and its own specialized software), then comparing it to a monitor isn’t accurate. It’s not a peripheral when it’s a standalone device.

The conclusion I draw from this is that people don’t like having to wear special glasses or a device strapped to their face, even if it is relatively cheap to produce.

Bingo. I often used the 3D on the 3DS, but that’s because I didn’t have to do anything other than not move the device around too much. So it worked for gaming at home, not on/in a vehicle.

Thank you for getting what I meant, lol

I think a lot of people are missing the point, but the commenter that replied to you got it.

What I’m saying is that many people are happy to BS and repeat things that they’ve read or heard as if it were fact. Meanwhile they did get it from their hairdresser. But because they repeated it with confidence, someone else would then repeat it because they read it on the internet from someone who seems to know what they’re talking about.

The cycle continues.

But if people say “I heard from my hairdresser/LLM”, then people know to take it with a grain of salt, or will call someone out on it.

I’m not saying the LLM is a good source, nor am I saying it’s good when someone uses one as a source. I’m saying it’s good when someone mentions that an LLM is their source for something they’re saying.

Hey, at least some people are citing their sources.

How often do people say stuff like that without telling others where it came from? It’s easy enough to accept things as true if they sound reasonable. Having a source means that grain of salt is already there.

Or the GameCube…or an add-on to the N64.

The N64’s codename was the Ultra 64 afterall!