Counting for what? Translations are never going to be as good as the original, that applies to everything, not just the Quran
If you’re here, there’s still hope for the internet
Don’t let it fall
Counting for what? Translations are never going to be as good as the original, that applies to everything, not just the Quran
There are also translations in all major languages of course
It’ll help a lot, and you can def read it but to understand it properly you need to learn Quranic Arabic
That was a long time ago, I highly doubt it still is
That’s a terrible metric. By this providers that maximize hardware (and energy) use by having a queue of requests would be seen as having more energy use.
It’s cheaper though, so very likely it’s more efficient somehow.
Sure, but it’s still symbolically very important
React native isn’t the same as native
If prefer if it was a live stream of somewhere nearby. Maybe not as pretty but it’s closer to actually seeing outdoors
To be fair, most drivers have multiple ongoing deliveries (and space for them). So it’s not quite one car per burrito
👆 This mf has never had siblings
Insult me harder daddy 🤤
Political science
Proof of stake
Position
It’s just a really common one
Also data for advertising
My mom makes extensive use of a good delivery service. It’s called me
That’s the benchmark I guess. Let’s see how long it takes to get there.
I know the general term, but I don’t see how in this case still. On somewhere like amazon, there’s a clear incentive to have bad search, initially to capture sellers, then later to force them to pay to be high in search results, but youtube has no such program. You can’t pay to be higher in search results.
but I don’t understand, how does having shitty search help improve advertiser revenue
Practically every model has better ethics than the current white house .