So say someone is a raging bigot. You rely on regular users to flag up things that cross the line for moderators to deal with and correct the record when they lie or post stuff without context eg to provide a balanced perspective. Unless they have blocked most of the active users who would be liable to do these things.

If you can’t see the replies how can you possibly be harassed by it?

I’m tired of having empathy for pieces of shit 99.5% of people aren’t trash and we would be better on average if we dropped them in the bin.

Now you can get arrested and kicked out of school and have your school career and college options ruined for following the strategy you did

Not really. His death put a cap on his ability to say new things or respond to current happenings and cultural events. He was neither timeless nor profound and 5 years from now this is the only thing most people will remember vs him yapping in their feeds about current events this diminished him.

Bullying is often in the form of low-level violence combined with verbal and other forms of harassment committed repeatedly by folks who enjoy it.

There is little hope of beating it at the same level of intensity and for reasons of culture and not prosecuting thousands of kids adults avoid dealing with low intensity harm between kids even when over time it is intolerable. Beating up the bully requires one to be capable of such when the bully may be larger and physically imposing and part of a group then not getting treated as the guilty party afterward for being the one who actually caused real harm as if the harm of years of harassment aren’t real.

Its great your solution worked for you but for lots it would mean bully and friends get to beat you without consequence and you get in trouble reinforcing the game.

Its quite frankly on average a bs solution. The actual one is to pay attention to who is a pos and kick the 1% worst pos to shit schools so 99% can learn in peace.

Duh

I think platforms can dissallow some unreasonable content without 3rd parties trying to police all porn

Leftwing extremists want to tax the rich and give everyone medicine but they are willing to compromise and just keep our existing broken system if others don’t agree… Rightwing extremists want to build concentration camps for democrats and brown people, punish gay people for existing, subjugate women and crush all resistance murdering people if they can’t get the votes to do it democratically.

Right wing moderates are ok with this and believe other people should be ok with them for going along with this.

No I’m supporting shut down of streaming channels that appear to show abuse or harm in a non functional context that is either non consentual or that no reasonable person would consent to.

Almost every website has a TOS and censors some stuff against said terms. You act like its not already nornal to have standards for conduct.

There are literally 2 groups of people with aligned interests declaring them one is simple confusion. APAIC is literally a largish part of the alignment because whilst the government budget runs into trillions single digit millions are dispositive in the continuation of a lawmakers career which is why they spend half their time fundraising.

Pretending that they aren’t effected by who pays for their life effectively is insane

Why should they err on that side again?

Yes to some degree obviously I want some editorial control. For instance I don’t want people posting snuff films or child porn and I want sited that wouldn’t remove such themselves removed.

Because they by running a business are responsible to ensure that they don’t promote or willfully ignore harm brought about wholly or in part by their actions or negligence.

For actually moral folks the minimum the law requires is a starting point not the last word.

Eg moral folks ask is there anything I am doing that causes harm or anything I’m not doing that I reasonably ought to do to prevent it.

Smart people too as many governments take a dim view of dodging responsibly and will invent new laws to regulate you.

the free AI service is literally a throttled version of the same tech with fewer options available its the same thing the idea that the free one is a mindless learning one and the expensive one is the real one is a fundamental misunderstanding based on nothing.

You cannot actually serve hundreds of millions in the US even if you invested the 75B it would cost to give every household a satellite it just can’t support the bandwidth.

So imagine that he IS car jacked. Someone presumably approaches his car and reveals a gun.

Does he… draw a gun every time someone approaches his car.

Draw a gun every time someone approaches his car while black

Use spider sense to figure out who the car jacker and shoot them first like John WIck

Have a 99% chance of being in a position wherein the thug has their gun drawn whilst he doesn’t ensuring the act of attempting to draw will result in him getting shot.

Obviously someone could car jack you with a knife or even just a threat of physical force with their fists if they caught you outside your car but once you are in the car and buckled up I would assume short of a gun you would literally just lock the door and drive. If you are worried about being physically dragged out of your car the seatbelt would actually help.

Also most car jackings involve the bad guys actually approaching the car. If you DID want to do “something” the something would be shooting them.

Is he imagining jumping out with his fists of fury and chasing the fleeing thug and anticipating the belt slowing him down?

AI versions which replace him with Obama. Extra points for having him shit talk the old host and joke about firing him.

Gladiator?