Yeah that’s what I meant by “people who use it more probably think it has a better layout”. I’ve tried to use it in the fashion it was designed on a couple of occasions but the version control / repository categorization functions didn’t make sense to me. I assume it would if I did those things more but I also think it’s laid out differently than I would like even for those purposes.
I’m with you on github for sure. I assume people who use it regularly think it has a decent layout but to me it seems so random and disjointed that I can’t imagine how that’s possible.
I think the current moral question society is wrestling with is along those lines. Something to the effect of, how removed from the outcome of a decision does one need to be in order to absolve themselves of responsibility for that outcome? Essentially, why is it OK for a CEO or a President to cause thousands of deaths by signing a piece of paper but not OK for that same person to go out and shoot those thousand people one at a time? The outcome is the same there’s just more obfuscation along the way in the first case. The greed motivation seems to be the difference. The CEO isn’t usually killing people because he wants them dead, he’s doing it because he views them as acceptable casualties in his quest to make money.
Charlie Kirk is a great example of that phenomenon as well. He may not have directly shot anybody but he undoubtedly influenced people towards doing exactly that. To what degree should he bear the blame for their actions? He certainly didn’t do it in complete ignorance of the possibility that people could die but does the separation from the actual crime make his actions morally acceptable? Does it make any difference if his motivations were money and power as opposed to bigotry and hatred?
You’re right, they’re a gas.
Who are the good guys? I don’t have any problem identifying the bad guys but the good guys seem pretty hard to locate when it comes to politics.
It’s not about wishing pain on others it’s about hoping they will learn. If words fail then perhaps pain will work.
It’s also not reasonable to expect people to be perfectly patient with their idiotic neighbors who categorically refuse to engage the rational parts of their minds. That’s not a human response to self destructive stupidity. A human response is to ostracize the offenders until they stop endangering the group with their poor decisions.
I don’t disagree with your assessment but if we are collectively dumb enough to subject ourselves to obviously bad ideas simply because we haven’t experienced the negative effects of those ideas firsthand then we deserve the consequences of such colossal stupidity.
Commenting to come back later and check out some of the filth you heathens are into
It’s not unreasonable for you to expect it to know that but I think it is unreasonable to expect it to use that information for your benefit. That’s not why it’s collecting that data.
That response is almost as dumb as googling that question in the first place.
It’s actually sitting in one place putting up with a bunch of bullshit for most of the day. That is an essential skill in the modern workplace.
You say that like it would help us currently. We keep electing these people. We’re clearly not collectively interested in removing them from power.
If you mean Elizabeth Warren then he better watch out or she’ll join the race and stay in just long enough for the centrists to consolidate support and then drop out without endorsing him. That’s exactly what she did to Bernie.
You might think so but that reasoning is based on logic and critical evaluation of people, which is obviously something MAGA doesn’t do or else they never would have ended up supporting a man like Trump in the first place. Vance isn’t any less charismatic than Trump’s “grab em by the pussy” self was in 2016. Which is to say that neither one has any charisma to speak of.
Those same things were said about hundreds of other technologies that no longer exist in any meaningful sense. Current usage of a technology, which in this specific case I would argue is largely frivolous anyway, is not an accurate indicator of future usage.
I guarantee there is a way to login without using a smartphone app. It may be easier but that’s not the same as required.
Every bank in the country has a website. Just use your browser like a regular desktop user. Not everything needs to be an app ffs.
Yep, the only thing I’m 100% confident about in this whole mess is that Trump will find some heretofore unimagined way to make it worse.
I do wish we could stop confusing tolerance with active support though. I don’t need to be on your team to tolerate you or your lifestyle. In fact, we don’t even need to acknowledge each other’s existence to be tolerant of one another. We just need to let each other exist unimpeded.