Maybe. Nobody can prove it.

Obviously you don’t know what gen AI has become.

Japan is country that has legal drawn cp. It’s available in physical store and online. Yet Japan is much lower than most developed country in the world in terms of actual sexual child abuse.

So is that the Gen AI problem or the open internets problem. It sounds like you hate the open internet and awful people who put real cp online and not Gen AI.

I mean, you’re not giving a very convincing argument.

But who is actually getting hurt? No kid has gotten hurt using Gen AI.

Im not advocating for cp. I’m advocating for freedom.

A crime is only a crime if someone is negative effected. Gen AI is just a more accessible Photoshop.

I don’t need to. It’s is just the way gen AI works. It takes images of things it knows and then generates NEW content based on what it think you want with your prompts.

If I’m looking for a infant flying an airplane, gen AI knows what a pilot looks like and what a child looks like and it creates something new.

Also kids face data doesn’t mean they take the actual face of the actual child and paste it on a body. It might take an eyebrow and a freckle from one kidand use a hair style from another and eyes from someone else.

Lastly, the kids parents consented when they upload images of their kids on social media.

I agree it shouldn’t be accepted, but I disagree on being allowed. I think it should be allowed because it doesn’t hurt anyone.

Japan has a vibrant drawn cp market yet they not not even close to the highest rate of child abuse. https://undispatch.com/here-is-how-every-country-ranks-on-child-safety/

No cp should be acceptable. But I argue AI generated isn’t cp.

This is no different than someone cutting out a child’s head from a Target catalog and sticking it to a body on a playboy magazine and masturbating to it.

Or someone using Photoshoping a kids head to a pornographic photo.

It’s just a more accessible version of those examples.

At the end of the day, what you do in your own home is your thing. t’s not my business what you do. As long as it doesn’t hurt/affect anyone, go ahead.

Technically speaking, if you post images of your child on social media, you have consented. If you never uploaded an image of your child online, you never need to worry.

Gen AI doesn’t take cp content and recreates it. There wouldn’t be a point of gen AI if that is the case. It knows what regular porn looks like and what a child looks like and it generates an image. With those inputs it can create something new and at the same time hurt nobody.

I’m no pedo, but what you do in your own home and hurts nobody is your own thing.

Who actually gets hurt in AI generated cp? The servers?

You missed libertarians

Whatever it takes for me to survive out here.

So I work in advertising for a company that is top 20 on the Fortune 500. We advertise everywhere including Reddit.

The returns on Reddit isn’t even very good. We still spend money there as a pure name recognition play.

As of now, for the company I work for, it’s not working.

I recommend deleting this. If anyone really cared, they would search for it themselves. Don’t give X any SEO backlinks.

I honestly would delete this. Don’t give X/Twitter any SEO backlinks.