Mind the shavings

  • 1 Post
  • 31 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 16th, 2024

help-circle





  • I wouldn’t.

    I’d approach it from a personal level, as in, “you’re disgusting for doing this, you’re disgusting for pretending any of this bullshit is defensible. This is beyond the pale. I’ll talk to you again if you stop it with the crap, not before. I’m ashamed to come from people who would do this.”

    I don’t know if it’s a good idea to try and talk actual policy points with them. You think they reasoned their way there? This isn’t politics, it’s assholish indecency. Treat it like the thing it is.

    Debating people who’s entire thing is “don’t be serious but make the others be” is dumb. Clown on em, tell them you can visit when they stop being transparently awful. Make it their job to patch things up, and don’t use kid gloves. Don’t allow the idea that they have a point into the conversation. That only applies to people who have points. Nazi shit gets you put in time out instead.

    Don’t take up the mantle of always having to put out the fire they keep lighting in the bridge between you. They’ll burn it down and try to blame you for it, mark my words.


  • Decentralize the shit out of this, please. Make sure their tech-heads know that the document itself is unkillable. It’ll always pop up somewhere else.

    This is a fantastic idea, at least in some form.

    The category of information could stand as much defining as possible. I like where it’s going, laying out lies and dog whistles and incorrectly defined terms.

    The first column in a table is labeled “reality”, in black lettering, and it says, for example, “I will underpay you and you will sing my praises for it”, and the second column is labeled “fascist lie”, with words written in red, and in red letters it says “personal responsibility”. Lead with the truth. Eye is drawn to the truth, so maybe red is bad if it draws the eye, even though it’s also the color for “incorrect”. These are the choices that matter.

    You could refine those substitutions to make a little fascist translator. Maybe re-write key lines of relevant speeches in translated form.

    Just riffing. Whatever it becomes, make sure you state the facts in a way where you actually communicate them, as opposed to some idiot headline like “jd vance says (random lie)”, helping the lie instead of helping the truth.

    Very much like this idea, in a lot of variations.

    My inclination is, focus up. You’ll have sticking power through focus more than being an all in one shop. Maybe. If you feel a strong pull otherwise, then maybe not.