A quarter of width times height divided by the inverse of pi

Option 3: I remember I don’t have to take sides?

That argument can be applied widely, no? In the extreme it becomes: “you’re free to say whatever you want, just as long no-one can hear you”.

So it becomes a question of magnitude of the censorship. If the argument pro this ban is to counter propaganda, I fail to see the distinction between this and facebook or tiktok or …

The current situation, where those closest to the issueing party of new currency reap the biggest reward, also sounds not very usefull. Therefore I do applaud alternatives, be they not perfect.

Bitcoin is the only inflation resistant currency I know of.

Generators would be rewarded with a blockchain token for the energy generated, while consumers would pay for the energy in those tokens.

Any electricity market should take into account that production and consumption should be balanced at all times.

If I produce today, but there’s not enough consumption of electricity, should I be rewarded with a token?

If I want to consume tonight, spend the token I bought, but there’s not enough production, what’s the token for?

In other words: such a token assumes infinite storage of electricity, a kWh today is the same as a kWh tonight. This doesn’t reflect reality.