He’s just shitting these out and no agency knows what the fuck is going on.

Like, I laughed that he declared every human a woman, but I’m really starting to think someone is just asking a chatbot to write an executive order that does _____. And then they’re not even reading them first.

“Luigi” was the response to “how do we fight fascism”…

That is the context you were avoiding by not linking.

This isn’t an argument, I’m trying to explain something to you.

Yeah, once I noticed the post title it made sense why you removed the comments.

But even without that:

But mods can be stricter than the instance.

It’s ridiculous that people leap to the “.world is full of pro-corprate fascists” because they disagree with a single mod.

There’s more than few instances I dont like, so I’ve blocked them and never see them. I don’t know why people with the axe to grind against .world dont do the same thing.

Edgy kids just want to find the line and then constantly put their toes over it and claim nothing is allowed because they personally crossed a line.

So…

Members of the government are seizing private companies for themselves?

Isn’t that why we can’t have universal healthcare or free education?

Because the slippery slope would lead to the government seizing private property?

Why are we skipping the good parts?

Devils advocate:

you may use physical force upon another person when and to the extent you reasonably believe such to be necessary to defend yourself or a third person from what you reasonably believe to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by such other person.

Luigi can claim he believes it’s unlawful…

It doesn’t have to actually be unlawful.

His lawyers can start talking about why it’s lawful for insurance companies to decline claims based onnshitty AI.

Opening up a huge can of worms because records disclosed in this can be used for civil trials later…

Especially class actions for people the AI denied wrongly.

Like, dude allegedly executed a CEO in broad daylight, why wouldn’t he want to try and steer this court case towards that stuff?

No idea why you’re being so vague…

This?

https://lemmy.world/comment/14592254

Looks like a mod replied and then deleted so not sure what they said.

But yeah, those comments don’t seem to violate .world’s TOS, and I have no idea why a mod would have deleted them. But mods can be stricter than the instance.

I’m not sure why you’re blaming the whole instance for what one mod is doing.

Edit:

The thread title is “how to fight fascism” which is important context I missed earlier.

So yeah, the first comment saying just “Luigi” could very easily be considered a call to violence. Then the next one say “did nothing wrong” also makes sense to remove.

It’s actually not always wrong…

Legally speaking:

In most countries, it is lawful for a citizen to repel violence with violence to protect someone’s life or destruction of property.[3]

The scope of self-defense varies; some jurisdictions have a duty to retreat rule that disallows this defense if it was safe to flee from potential violence. In some jurisdictions, the castle doctrine allows the use of deadly force in self-defense against an intruder in one’s home. Other jurisdictions have stand-your-ground laws that allow use of deadly force in self-defense in a vehicle or in public, without a duty to retreat.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justifiable_homicide

Not saying it’s perfect, but it’s likely the defense he’ll use if not denying he pulled the trigger.

They’d just have to convince a jury that denying healthcare which causes injury and death to a shit ton of Americans is a use of imment force and this action would have lessened it.

If they show that after the shooting less claims were denied…

It probably won’t work, but that’s the path to jury nullification without saying jury nullification is our defense.

Under the New York Penal Law Article 35, you may use physical force upon another person when and to the extent you reasonably believe such to be necessary to defend yourself or a third person from what you reasonably believe to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by such other person.

Tilem & Associates points out in an article that the term “reasonably” is used twice in the law mentioned above. Both your belief that force is being used or about to be used and your belief that your use of physical force is necessary to stop the attack must be reasonable under the circumstances if you want to successfully use the defense of justification.

https://documentedny.com/2023/07/27/new-york-self-defense-laws-stand-your-ground/

It’s a sound legal defense, and as far as I know it’s his only option.

But as always: IANAL

A comment was removed that simply said “Luigi did nothing wrong”, which aligns with your first example. The reason given was “wrongful advocacy”, which suggests having a positive opinion of Luigi is against TOS.

Waaaay back when it happened (feels like months but wasn’t it just a few weeks?) there was a mod who didn’t understand things and removed some comments they shouldn’t. What I remember blowing up was removal of a comment just mentioning jury nullification was a thing. The mod thought because you’d get removed from a jury for talking about it, it was against US law to talk about it.

Which is incredibly ignorant.

Going off memory tho admins stepped in quickly and clarified what was ok.

So if you want to talk about a past issue and how it was resolved, that’s fine.

But it’s a different conversation than what we’re having, which is about post admin clarification

Nope.

It’s just when people say we should murder people, it’s against the terms of service, so the comment gets removed.

So you can say pretty much anywhere:

Insurance is a scam and I don’t give a fuck a CEO was murdered

Even:

I hope jury nullification happens for Lugi and anyone else in his position.

But you can’t say:

We should murder more CEOs

It’s honestly not that complicated, but lots of people seem to be confused.

4d wave feminism…

I never understood the “enough spam” communities…

They don’t stop posts from going to main communities, it just doubles every post.

Like, especially in this case I agree that there’s too many musk posts…

But I just don’t understand how reposting every article about him helps anything.

Meanwhile, American users are flocking to RedNote because authorities have worked themselves into a lather over privacy concerns about TikTok, while U.S. tech giants harvest user data with industrial efficiency. The difference? American data collection is done for profit, and Chinese data collection is done for control. Pick your poison.

Hard to argue Zuck and Elon don’t want control either…

They’re ending it in America, because it’s what trump wants.

If they end it in civilized countries, it’ll get banned like Twitter was in Brazil.

Means absolutely nothing because by the end of the “looking into” period, trump will be in charge.

The rule, which will undergo a 120-day period for public comments, comes in response to what administration officials described as a need to protect national security while also clarifying the rules under which companies in trusted partner countries could access the emerging technology in order to promote innovation.

Stop giving Dems credit for “looking into” whether they’re going to do things.

Because when we do, they never make it past that point. They already got the pat on the head.

It’s like managers who only care about tracked metrics, rather than helping the American people so they support Dems, they just want to skip straight to “people like us” and empty promises are the quickest route to that.

Unless people stop clapping till shit actually happens

So you think trump was a good guy back then?

He’s always been a piece of shit, and that’s the type of people neoliberals take money from…

Like, yeah, it was before Obama’s first term, but you forget it was supposed to be “Hillary’s turn” just 3 years after that wedding.

She was in fundraising mode for 2008, and the money trump gave was used to try and stop Obama in the Dem primary

That’s what I’m getting at.

People like trump pay to make sure the furtherest left the Dems go is still on the right economically.

People love to forget that the Clinton’s were at trump and Melinia’s wedding in 2005

They likely all four hated each other back then too, but trump gave a lot of money to the party and wanted a former president there.

But Hillary’s always been about the money and her people have been running the DNC ever since.

We have to come to the realization that at least some of the big money donors are just as shitty as trump, and they’re not just getting Bill to show up at weddings for payback.

The neo liberal movement has destroyed the Dem party, and we’re just now getting the chance to get another type of leadership in the party

Not just social issues.

It’s easier if people quit than you firing them.

So do shit like this so people “protest resign” and fill their positions with H1B’s who can’t resign because they’d be deported and take a fraction of the pay.

Resigning in protest is never a good idea.

Stay, obstruct, make them fire you.

I never understood why people post their own medium blog posts like it’s a valid article and not the exact same as a myspace post