Fushuan [he/him]

You said it, it’s not a free speech platform, it’s a speech free platform.

Nor where I live, but it’s whatever school there is between 16 to 18. In mine I’d say whatever it was between 13 to 18. Kids were wild.

College =/ high school though.

That’s not the part that was shamed, was it?

It doesn’t, that’s Ikea’s fork, I know it. It’s super uncomfortable for me but I’m the neurotypical in the house, my partner only uses those.

My partner has ADHD and autism and they swear by 5. That’s IKEA’s cheap fork and in our house I’m forced to use all the other forks (which are better so whatever). In their words: “all the other ones are too pointy”. I don’t fucking know.

I’d prefer if I didn’t have to iterate twice…

You clearly haven’t experimented with AI much in a work environment. When asked to do specific things that you are not sure if are possible it will 100% ignore part of your input and always give you a positive response at first.

“How can I automate outlook 2020 to do X?”
‘You do XYZ’
me, after looking it up"that’s only possible in older versions"
‘You are totally right, you do IJK’
“that doesn’t achieve what i asked”
‘Correct, you can’t do it.’

And don’t get me started on APIs of actual frameworks… I’ve wished to punch it hard when dealing with react or spark. Luckily I usually know my stuff and only use it to find a quick example of something that I test locally before implementing if 5 mins of googling didn’t give me the baseline, but the amount of colleagues that not only blindly copy code but argue with my reasoning saying “chatgpt says so” is fucking crazy.

When chatgpt says something I know is incorrect I ask for sources and there’s fucking none. Because it not possible my dude.

I know it doesn’t, I was countering your logic of “I’m a professional programmer” as if the correct interaction would be obvious to a programmer. The intended interaction requires extra thought and to be more through than the obvious one, as you have described.

deleted by creator

Are you intentionally ignoring that the actual names of the files are “11. EpisodeEleven.mp3”? There’s whitespaces and a bunch of letters there.

I’m also a professional programmer, and assuming that sorting by numbers code would try to grab the first block of strings until the first whitespace is a big assumption I would not make. I’d say that after trying to convert everything but the extension to a number for sorting it failed so it defaulted to string sorting for everything else.

you made me open the phone because I didn’t believe you, thanks xD

from those of us that are on pc, result please?

Romance stories where the story doesn’t end the moment they kiss/confess/become a couple. There’s more of those lately so I’m happy.

Legally speaking children can’t consent, which is why it’s illegal and the basis of my statement. I wasn’t being pedantic, I was showing a new terminology.

Different legislations have different consent ages, but in the internet we should go by the highest one since anything can be viewed from anywhere.

FYI, the current accepted term is csam. Children sexual abuse material. The reason why CP is wrong is that porn implies, or should imply, that there’s consent on the sexual act, and children cannot consent.

You are right, it’s a disgusting merger exactly because it implies something that’s absolutely incorrect and wrong.

Why are you linking me the same website I linked?

Wym see also, that’s the link I shared 1 hour ago in this very comment chain.

Google (which purchased Fitbit, which had bought Pebble) still owns PebbleOS - https://repebble.com/

Right in their website.

Not even spaniards use them in nonformal written format my dude.