There’s only one way to find out. Are you asking because you’re in the position to do it? Go ahead, it will be epic

Every post on Lemmy has a couple of downvotes. Whether it’s haters, bots or accidental clicks, I don’t know. I suspect all 3.

deleted by creator

I’ve seen reports of this kind of scam before, and it’s fairly hard to defend against.

Unlike many scams, the scammers actually deliver what they are selling - the land. Of course they failed to mention it’s useless if you plan to develop anything, but that’s a lot harder to prove in court than a plain theft.

Ok, let me try to approach this seriously.
You need to figure out some things:

1. Why did you cheat

• Because you were angry with your wife?
• Because you like the other woman?

2. If a similar situation arises in the future how are you going to react

• “I won’t do it again” is not a good answer. “I’m going to do X instead” is better.

You don’t have to respond to us here, think about these things and talk about it with your wife.

So it’s really good at the thing LLMs are good at. Don’t judge a fish by it’s ability to climb a tree etc…

Neither - the words you mentioned are usually employed by people wanting to take advantage of you.
Distancing from it is a self-preservation thing, and sometimes a moral thing. People don’t like being played, or doing bad things because someone told them it’s for family/clan/country/etc.

Spain

To go into some more details-
Good: Serious crimes are punished - I don’t expect anyone to get away with murder. There are no political crimes, you won’t get imprisoned for being against the government. Minimal religious influence on laws.
Bad: Small crimes like theft is are not treated consistently. Unlike some who call for harsher penalties I disagree. I think the penalties are appropriate but a lot of cases go ignored. If every case was processed even with a metaphorical slap on the wrist, there would basically be no theft.
To be seen: Command responsibility. Recently there was a case where a government official’s inaction during a natural disaster resulted in people dying. Some would have died anyway but it could have been minimized if they acted quickly. The trial is in progress, we’ll see what comes of it, but the laws exist.

Yes, mostly. There are some improvements that could be done, but I don’t think any fundamental reforms are needed.

TCP and UDP are still possible over layer 2 avian carrier

For religious people - because Christianity allows only one spouse.
For non-religious it has a bad reputation due to the way it used to be practiced in the Arab world (and elsewhere) where it’s not symmetrical - a husband is allowed multiple wives but a wife is not allowed multiple husbands.

Lately there has been a rise in acceptance of polyamory - understanding that people may have multiple partners at the same time, and this should be accepted.

Nice of you to assume I was ever culturally relevant

I’m sorry but ketamine can only be stashed in a 2001 Honda Civic

Who cares. The origins of homosexuality might be an academic curiosity but none of it matters really for the purpose of living a life.

There is no moral or practical difference if a person was born with it or acquired it later.

Understood motivation and didn’t care about pointless bullshit. Helps he was the co-owner of the company. He cared about growth and revenue and having a team motivated to achieve all that. He didn’t care how or where or when I did the work, or having procedures for promotions.

The rule was - line goes up everyone gets a raise.

Perfectly represented - never. Partially yes - I can always find someone who’s opinions are not completely abhorrent, and some of it agrees with mine. But it’s never all in one candidate.

So I resort to alternate voting. If any of the acceptable candidates is currently in opposition I vote for them, choosing whichever party is not currently in government but has a reasonable chance to enter government in the next cycle.

It’s when doing actions/work gets you closer to a goal

I’m lowkey impressed (in a negative way) if someone can establish an emotional relationship with an AI.

It’s hard enough to do it with an actual human where the other person does half of the work. AI only follows the instructions that you give it. Imagine having to do both sides of a relationship.

They’re quite active on Reddit. It seems that the Fediverse didn’t resonate as much as with English speaking Redditors.