It makes me wonder why the founding fathers left that out.

I know a large reason we don’t have a direct democracy is because they didn’t trust the general population to not fall victim to a tyrant (which is super ironic).

I’m curious if the system was intentionally designed so that the only way the people can remove someone was through violence, or if they thought 2A would prevent the need.

I really wish the US had a democratic process for removing a member of the federal government.

That’s why you get litter mates. They teach each other to play without pain.

Why does it have to achieve an immediate result to be a worthy action?

I think it’s the motorcycle equivalent to having a hentai girl tattooed on your arm.

Not really.

He was clearly joking when he said that. Like, there are a million legitimate things to pick on him about. Let’s not invent them.

¿Porque los dos?

I mean…

gestures around to everything

They already won. 9/11 was the tipping point where shit started collapsing.

I’m not super knowledgeable on Israel’s history, but didn’t they just kinda show up and say, “This is my land now.”

Even humans are shit at estimating ages, especially outside your own race. I don’t see current AI/ml being able to do any better.

Any headline that’s a question can be answered with No

It can definitely do creative stuff if you write the prompt properly. Even for straight up art it can be a great tool for generating reference photos.