It’s Michael Jordan.

Correct.

There’s a very obvious business reason why though.

That’s how you call crepes. Crepes are not pancakes.

Pancackes.

Thailand bad ending.

It is also a masturbatory product of Apple itself that, with such a product, would love to portray itself as a corporate that “knows” and is engaged in turning a certain work culture into a new one, where one can truly be themselves at work.

The nudges at a cult of a dead leader, Jobs, or even the exlicit adoption of apple logo and eastetics of the final event of S1, where Helly R. finds out the people oppressing her couldn’t be any more similar to herself.

It’s just human and their weakness. Nobody is at fault, how tragic. How convenient.

ITT: people listing good games they played a bunch.

The answer is clearly world of warcraft.

Education.

You ate 10 times in two months? That can’t be healthy.

It can be valid, it surely doesn’t apply to Gaza.

We are “all” guilty because we knowingly pollute, for example, and that kills people. And we buy products and that finance Israel bombs. And we fight for survival and strangle our jailer that just landed that job to feed his family and never got quality education to choose a different career.

I am more of the idea that there are no truly guilty in a strict sense. We as a society share the responsibility to handle the now extended knowledge we have and we are basically not even trying.

You missed a word in there.

I don’t think it’s lack of empaty, or rather, it’s not just lack of empaty, I think it’s more an active lumping together of people and ancestry.

So much so Zionist, and Nazi, are into their own a-priori “positive” quality, coherently, absurdly so, Palestinian children have a-priori negative qualities.

I feel sick just typing this because I would think this is very very very clearly idiotic. But it seems to take hold of plenty of people’s worldview.

Not the point here. Using it in a commercial environment for free was a violation of the terms, now it’s not anymore.

I’m 100% pushing nothing but Signal. It’s the easiest one that brings with it a genuine mental switch. I like to assume that after such a transition it will be easier to look at anything else down the line, say if Meta buys it or some other dystopian shit.

I know it was a great attempt at humour on my part.

From an ethical standoint any earnst attempt at upholding privacy is equally valid. Past the technical necessity, you should probably look at those tools from any ulterior motives standpoint, or path toward a potential future monetization.

On this front, Telegram is clearly shit, Signal is centralized and nothing prevent it from turning “evil” and starting to charge money.

Ideally you’d need complete open sourceness to start getting your feet into ethics, possibly also some political statement beyond some bland “free speech” stance.

The question says “for my phone”.

Also by your logic why use a PC, just don’t use the internet at all.

Ethic pertains to the morality of ones action. Think of murder, as a generally agreed unmoral act, or sharing freely as a generally moral act.

Think of it as the market growing or falling, but in a context where this does not really benefit you personally.

I know it sounds really convoluted but believe or not, that’s what humanity used to run on.

(Also Briar can make a completely decentralyzed network relying on connecting phoner directly and boucing the messadge around, It’s almost a must have if you are, like, trying to organyze when the government shut down the internet and stuff.)

That’s a thing? I thought long haired people did that to somehow manage the mess and delay the drying…

There’s lots of costs that don’t show up in the 5$ value. Considering limited resources, the value in human lives tied with pollution, the pollution you are not generating during the two hours of hobbying…

I think the math checks out most of the time.

That’s what she said, for a while.