

You can’t design away stupid, but if this is a regular problem then the intersection is designed stupid and you need to design a better one.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/201978334-killed-by-a-traffic-engineer
This is an alt account, you may see it around. I am not ban-dodging intentionally, I promise!
This is the main
https://scribe.disroot.org/u/drkt
You can’t design away stupid, but if this is a regular problem then the intersection is designed stupid and you need to design a better one.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/201978334-killed-by-a-traffic-engineer
What kind of car you like is one thing but does he understand that when he sits at a café next to a busy, congested road and blame the cyclists for the congestion that he’s actually just factually wrong? Because I don’t think he knows that. Jeremy Clarkson is fiercely anti-bicycle and until he says, in front of an audience, that he’s wrong about this and will stop spewing vitriol at bicyclists, I frankly don’t care about him.
This is nice to hear after finding out what an absolute boomer Jeremy is.
the Dark Reader Extension
That would explain that!
Also I stand corrected; I’m reading that code now and it only actually runs when it generates video thumbnails which is maybe 10 times a year.
I doubt I have such a thing as a daily visitor (not even myself) but who knows ;)
Shadowserver visits your site a minimum of 10 times daily, so don’t worry! You have visitors.
How are you managing dark mode? When I go to your site it’s white.
don’t fancy myself typing complex command lines when I can avoid it,
lmao, my real code that runs for thousands of visitors daily:
// This shouldn't be so complicated but I don't fucking understand video encoding so it's here to catch an issue with the videos I generate upstream
$cmd = "$ffmpegPath -i \"$videoPath\" -vf \"scale=trunc(min(iw\,200*iw/ih)/2)*2:200,setsar=1/1\" -c:v libx264 -crf 30 -preset veryslow -pix_fmt yuv420p -movflags +faststart \"$thumbnailPath\"";
exec($cmd);
@[email protected] also replying to you
I think there’s been a semantic misunderstanding -
I’m saying that people are going to be stupid and you should design an intersection that accounts for it. I don’t think that’s ‘designing away stupid’ because the stupid is still present. It has merely been limited or entirely contained, but I don’t want to have a semantic argument. Just understand that we agree, and the book I reference says almost exactly what you both said.