In terms of restitution, sure, the victim should have input. But in cases like imprisonment, I don’t see why the victim should have input into the length of a sentence, for example. If the offender is a danger to the public, they should remain in prison until such time that they are not. Emotional appeals should not factor into that determination.
Hot take: victim impact statements shouldn’t be allowed. They are appeals to emotion.
That’s the thing, it doesn’t do updates. This is just to scare people into paying.
How does that relate to videos of dead people speaking someone else’s words? The only reanimated people in Doom 2016 are the shambling zombies.
Ah yes, appeals to emotion, my favorite part of the judicial process.
For classes that’s are mostly lectures, it doesn’t need it.
I went to college to get the degree so I could check that box on job applications, I already knew most of the material.
You can also take a model trained on all kinds of data and tell it “generate ten billion articles of fascist knob-gobbling” and then train your own model on that data.
It’ll be complete AI slop, of course, but it’s not like you cared about truth or accuracy in the first place.
What can they do against so many changes in the tech world.
Be involved in their kids’ lives? Tech isn’t the problem here, any more than it could have been TV, drugs, rock and roll, video games, D&D, or organized religion. Kids get into some dumb shit, just because it’s the hot new thing doesn’t make it any different.
The places where automated semis make the most sense, i.e. large, well maintained highways connecting large urban centres, can be better served with automated railways.
On this I agree. For popular, well-defined routes, rail absolutely makes sense, not just for freight, but for passenger transport as well.
Yeah but it’d be fucking insane to build a state highway to each and every destination in every hamlet, just like it would be for rail.
And it’s not just cost of initial construction, it’s also cost of maintenance. If the ground shifts slightly under the road, it’s a bump. If it shifts under a railway, it’s a derailment for the first train that finds it and a couple million dollars in recovery and repair, plus the downtime while that section is out of service. And that doesn’t even start to account for overhead like signal operation, whereas on a road you just use a stop sign.
I like trains more than the next guy, but you absolutely cannot just replace every road with a railway.
Compared to building and maintaining a railway, yes, by orders of magnitude.
It’s absurd to suggest running a railway to every warehouse in East Bumfuck, Missouri.
A lot. Most of them do a lot of basic maintenance and break-fix work themselves.
Not news or article. Report it. I’m sick of seeing this garbage in a community for tech stuff.
So AOSP
I’ve read the article. If there is any dishonesty, it is on the part of the model creator or LLM operator.
To lie requires intent to deceive. LLMs do not have intents, they are statistical language algorithms.
Around 1950 or so. It’s probably considered a slur, though, only slightly better than “gooks”.
Sure, but that’s just vengeance.