There should be efforts to duplicate the results in an ethical way, the lack of rigorous ethics indicates biases. If you tortured a guy for research, did you also do less bad things like falsify results?

The Stanford prison experiment is a good example, afaik they published in several journals and I don’t believe any of them have printed retractions. There are huge problems with the methodology that are still being discussed, and the results are still being referenced.

AI is going to get worse, while stack overflow will be superceded by better resources in the future.

It would be pretty neat if Sal Kahn created an alternative, but that’s very different from his existing project.

The level of dishonesty out of you is disgusting.

It eludes to criminal culpability, but doesn’t point out who would actually be charged, or with what crime, or what authority would be persecuting. You’re using ambiguity to further your narrative.

Maybe get your ducks in a row on some facts, and then you’ll actually be able to hold warmongers accountable.

Spouting nonsense about criminality does nothing for the innocent dead, and does nothing to prevent deaths by these people.

Look at some statistics about incarceration in the US. Personal possession of plants has people in jail. There’s absolutely a difference between crimes and morals, you aren’t going to get justice conflating them.

Attorneys Warn Biden’s Support for Israeli Assault on Gaza Could Make Him Complicit in Genocide

Lots of coulds and cans. They ARE complicit, but until someone gets persecuted under someone’s laws, this isn’t a CRIME.

This seems like a reading comprehension issue on your part, for some reason you are conflating morally wrong and criminal.

That’s reprehensible, but not a crime.

Any actual crime?

I’ve been paying attention to the locker room talk.

One dude is scum, the other is boring.

This is laughable