Cases where you want something googled quickly to get an answer, and it’s low consequence when the answer is wrong.
IE, say a bar arguement over whether that guy was in that movie. Or you need a customer service agent, but don’t actually care about your customers and don’t want to pay someone, or your coding a feature for windows.
Or more importantly do the specific opposite of that. Vote 3rd parties, fight in the primaries in the local, state, and important levels everywhere you can.
Don’t throw your vote away on candidate of which your vote is literally less than one millionth of the way they need to get.
It’s OK the secretary of education was only promoting steak sauce in the classrooms.
Yeah on the whole my thoughts are… it’s probably not the utopia people want it to be… but I think it’s clear… what we have right now is pretty undeniably horrific. The whole concept of a single individual literally having more than millions of people put together, while billions are sweating whether they will keep basic necesities is so insane to me.
have to agree on that, there’s the variation, it’s faster if you take it’s code verbatim, run it, and debug where there’s obvious problems… but then you are vulnerable to unobvious problems, when a hacky way of doing it is weak to certain edge cases… and no real way to do it.
Reading it’s code, understanding it, finding the problems from the core, sounds as time consuming as writing the code.
I think the better question is, why can’t wireless charging be more universal. We had decades of 500 different competing phone chargers. (as the famous XKCD comic https://xkcd.com/927/ ) mocks.
yet we don’t seem to be getting anywhere near the idea of a universal wireless charge system.
Honestly from my understanding, Tay is pretty badly misrepresented. The headlines basically went as if read twitter posts, and the overwhelming negative content on it lead the algorythm to make it say really horrible stuff.
But the actuality of it was dumber, the AI side of it to my knowledge never said anything offensive. They gave the damn thing a “Say” command. which basically the trolls learned in 2 seconds and instructed it to repeat racist things.
It’s a screenshot from a non federated social media. They have to avoid using most all words or the robots will hide or delete them.
sounds to me just like googles bots are finding them… could also just be maybe chrome or similar taking note when it finds a page and dropping a dime to google.
I don’t see why, least my understanding, you hit share chat, it creates a public link… google’s robots discover everything public and index it. Seems to me like the same problem would happen if you generated a link to share on any platform, and burned it and never sent information to any platform. Unless googles indexing all whatsapp messages, but that would be a much bigger story.
Anyway point is blame IMO falls on either chatgpt for not properly configuring a robots.txt, or google for not following it.
That is the one fear, especially considering… a now controlling amount of politicians can’t accept basic facts… so we’d see questions like “is climate change real”, “how old is the earth”.
Also worth pointing out, WHY the test is so bad… 1. obviously not even well educated people today can agree on the meaning of a good portion of the questions.
but the biggest thing is, not everyone had to take them… IE the key point intention was “if a parent or grandparent has ever voted, you can skip this test”. which is such a blatant giving away that they don’t care of an individuals knowledge, they aren’t actually worried if they can read, they were just keeping first generation voters from voting… at a time when in particular a specific subset of american’s were in position to be first generation voters.
I’d second this interpretation… least based on my interpretation of “cross out THE NUMBER”.
I mean purely pedantic, I have no idea the original test writers… but based on how I read the words
The number (one singular number needs to be crossed out)
Below one million, IE number < 1,000,000
So my conclusion
10000000000 < 1,000,000
Absolutely… in a world where the justice system is impartial and a consistent adherence to the law is judged rather than who appointed the judge.
That being said, I would say it’s more practical to make unprovable claims, not provably false claims.
Honestly I think different there… she’s not dumb, she’s got killer contacts, and she knows what happened to Epstein. In her shoes. I’d have used whatever I can to rig up a dead mans switch, then put pressure onto trump to get her out of there.
Well I mean bottom line is, it’s a damned if he does damned if he doesn’t situation.
She gets killed, that’s insane fuel to the fire.
Trump pardons her… that’s as good as admitting they are working together.
She actually tells what she knows, trumps fucked.
So… if you ask me based on a raw strategy… the DOJ is going to let the sweetheart deal appeal happen, and maxwell will comit perjury, say she happened to be in some of the places trump was, but never were that close and that trump always considered epstein a creep and kicked them out of marlago.
Fully agreed, the world is shitty, it used to be shittier… and I pray that it gets less shitty tomorrow, and we need to do everything we can to not slide back and revive the shittiest parts of our history.
I mean it varries a lot, a lot of shows put huge emphasis on building up to an ending.
I would say probably the biggest example would be lost… it feels like it’s building up to something special all throughout… it’s just like “a few more pieces and it will finally make sense”.
Then you get an ending that… well if anything can be improved with small edits.
While I agree with the fuck cars concept on a hundred fronts. Our dependency on them is certainly something that can be reduced.
They are still pretty far from equivelant.
IE without a major total rebuild of my city, adding public transfer infrastructure etc… cars are necessary for me to go to the grocery stores etc… Bottom line 500 things need to be done before they start restricting cars.
meanwhile guns, serve pretty much no practical use in civilized society except, potentially protect yourself from someone with a gun.