

Is it only pirate sites?
Because if we block worldwide pirate websites before terrorists ones that goes to show how powerful the copyright lobby is…
Makes pirated content look more important than terrorist sites.
Is it only pirate sites?
Because if we block worldwide pirate websites before terrorists ones that goes to show how powerful the copyright lobby is…
Makes pirated content look more important than terrorist sites.
Very interesting and a much appreciated work on that project that suspiciously refuses to act upon those blobs.
That’s not fair to change the system only when businesses require it. I received a fuckin’ letter from a government entity where I live for having downloaded the trash tier movie “Demolition”.
I agree copyright and patents are bad but it’s so infuriating that only the rich and powerful can choose not to respect it.
So I think openAI has to pay because as of now that shitty copyright and patent system is still there and has hurt many individuals around the world.
We should try to change the laws for copyright but after the big businesses pay their due.
They are not releasing anything of value in open source recently.
Sam altman said they were on the wrong side of history about this when deepseek released.
They are not open anymore I want that to be clear. They decided to stop releasing open source because 💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵.
So yeah I can have huge fines for downloading copyrighted material where I live, and they get to make money out of that same material without even releasing anything open source? Fuck no.
I would argue it’s a security issue not to have any ad blocking. Many scams online start with popups or fake ads.
So if you get the opportunity to talk to IT that’s what I would mention.
Publisher 360 I guess with some extra expensive cloud subscription.
Well yes, if you can afford to boycott airbnb clearly you could do so.
And AirBnB is all around the world so I’m sure there is plenty of illegal things to rent on Airbnb. They just look the other way.
Not OP but I wanted to thank you for the quality of your comment. It’s insightful, seems comprehensive and pragmatic.
We are lucky to have knowledgeable lemmynautes sharing what looks like very good advice on this topic.
I’m also considering taking a second indoor cat so I’m grateful I could read a detailed and well thought out post on this.
I personally have a female cat but I feel a bit bad she could feel lonely or “bored” during my absence when I’m at work. I’m probably projecting human feeling on my cat but I still think she would appreciate a cat friend to play with when I can’t do so. Also my cat has always been very scared of humans (except me that she completely feels safe with). Which means that essentially she will hide for hours if any other human being visits me. My probably naive idea was that she would gain trust when she sees another cat much less afraid of humans and accept the fact that most humans are not a threat. Obviously this is not the main reason that motivates me to get another cat. But it will certainly be more comfortable for my cat to feel less threaten by any human visiting my place. And as a bonus I would also get another furry friend :)
I will continue to ponder that decision for a few months anyway but I’m really appreciative of your comment and the great insights on a complicated question.
I think stand up maths did a video getting stung by bullet ants and showed it’s not as insanely painful as coyote seemed to imply.
So I indeed think he is over-dramatic most of the time…
Turn left to wreck your car
One single French company and that’s it :(?
I thought we had some great AI researchers in France but it seems they are long gone if all we can muster is one startup?
Oh I’m sure Adobe has the greatest of intentions on this. Such a reputable company that has a stellar past.
I’m sure they won’t gatekeep this digital human signature in some atrocious proprietary standard along with an expensive subscription to have the honor of using it.
Don’t listen to Adobe on AI or even better don’t accept any “idea” or solution from Adobe.
This may be obvious but maybe not moving furniture after the surgery and maybe planning ahead and rethink the way furniture may be suitable for her. For example if a sleeping spot is a bit hard to reach maybe get her used to some easier route to it.
I have no experience with blind cats but I would think it would help. Cats have a very good ability to memorize their space but it needs to stay the same for a blind cat.
It fucking sucks and will slow down the transition to electric cars.
We already have that shit in France too. The national companies sell prohibitively expensive cars with some amount of financial help. But if you buy a Chinese car (even with a demonstrably proven carbon footprint) you don’t get any help.
Basically this is about protecting our car industry and shielding from their incapacity to provide a value electric car to the masses. Nothing to do with emissions.
I thought it was obvious you wouldn’t say “hey I just took your benchy model and changed N vertices”. But just “happened” to inadvertently create a benchy lookalike.
Also there is definitely a point where it would be safe to reproduce the benchy design otherwise we could point at anything on earth and say “that’s a heavily modified benchy.”
Or are we all benchy? Am I a benchy with a thousand modified vertices?
So let’s be pragmatic there is nothing preventing me even to start a new design that vaguely ressemble the Benchy design. All it takes is for that “vaguely” to be enough so that you could argue you were not making a benchy redesign but just stumbled on something that could look Like a benchy.
I would actually suggest to make this new benchmark as close as possible to the original design as a middle finger to these idiots.
Any 3D printing lawyer interested in creating a 4D benchy? Also the same benchy but with just enough modifications to be legally safe?
What if there is no law about who gets affiliate money?
But you can already talk to bots by just opening the app and using it…