Publisher 360 I guess with some extra expensive cloud subscription.

Well yes, if you can afford to boycott airbnb clearly you could do so.

And AirBnB is all around the world so I’m sure there is plenty of illegal things to rent on Airbnb. They just look the other way.

Not OP but I wanted to thank you for the quality of your comment. It’s insightful, seems comprehensive and pragmatic.

We are lucky to have knowledgeable lemmynautes sharing what looks like very good advice on this topic.

I’m also considering taking a second indoor cat so I’m grateful I could read a detailed and well thought out post on this.

I personally have a female cat but I feel a bit bad she could feel lonely or “bored” during my absence when I’m at work. I’m probably projecting human feeling on my cat but I still think she would appreciate a cat friend to play with when I can’t do so. Also my cat has always been very scared of humans (except me that she completely feels safe with). Which means that essentially she will hide for hours if any other human being visits me. My probably naive idea was that she would gain trust when she sees another cat much less afraid of humans and accept the fact that most humans are not a threat. Obviously this is not the main reason that motivates me to get another cat. But it will certainly be more comfortable for my cat to feel less threaten by any human visiting my place. And as a bonus I would also get another furry friend :)

I will continue to ponder that decision for a few months anyway but I’m really appreciative of your comment and the great insights on a complicated question.

I think stand up maths did a video getting stung by bullet ants and showed it’s not as insanely painful as coyote seemed to imply.

So I indeed think he is over-dramatic most of the time…

Turn left to wreck your car

One single French company and that’s it :(?

I thought we had some great AI researchers in France but it seems they are long gone if all we can muster is one startup?

Oh I’m sure Adobe has the greatest of intentions on this. Such a reputable company that has a stellar past.

I’m sure they won’t gatekeep this digital human signature in some atrocious proprietary standard along with an expensive subscription to have the honor of using it.

Don’t listen to Adobe on AI or even better don’t accept any “idea” or solution from Adobe.

It fucking sucks and will slow down the transition to electric cars.

We already have that shit in France too. The national companies sell prohibitively expensive cars with some amount of financial help. But if you buy a Chinese car (even with a demonstrably proven carbon footprint) you don’t get any help.

Basically this is about protecting our car industry and shielding from their incapacity to provide a value electric car to the masses. Nothing to do with emissions.

I thought it was obvious you wouldn’t say “hey I just took your benchy model and changed N vertices”. But just “happened” to inadvertently create a benchy lookalike.

Also there is definitely a point where it would be safe to reproduce the benchy design otherwise we could point at anything on earth and say “that’s a heavily modified benchy.”

Or are we all benchy? Am I a benchy with a thousand modified vertices?

So let’s be pragmatic there is nothing preventing me even to start a new design that vaguely ressemble the Benchy design. All it takes is for that “vaguely” to be enough so that you could argue you were not making a benchy redesign but just stumbled on something that could look Like a benchy.

I would actually suggest to make this new benchmark as close as possible to the original design as a middle finger to these idiots.

Any 3D printing lawyer interested in creating a 4D benchy? Also the same benchy but with just enough modifications to be legally safe?

What if there is no law about who gets affiliate money?

Then it remains to be proven that it is illegal to poach affiliate links like that. Because Honey says they just follow strictly the “last click” rule that is common practice in the field.

It’s bullshit but if that bullshit rule is indeed the standard practice then it will be hard to fight.

Honey has in its terms of services that you accept not to take part in a class action lawsuit and favor arbitration. It seems like these kind of clause is enforceable usually so I’m curious to see how Legal Eagle will navigate the issue.

Edit: Either the creators sue Honey and they will argue it is not illegal to poach affiliate links because they follow the “last click” rule that is standard (it’s just that they pushed it to the extreme).

Or its the users that are scammed because they were told the best coupon would be used. But if it’s the users, they are under the EULA and should have to comply with the no class action rule.

I’m not a lawyer but this is how I understand the setup for this trial to be.

I was searching a bit about the subject and I think it’s a fairly legitimate concern.

Basically, life was always oriented one way on earth and some scientists are creating that mirror life.

But also this kind of research is important because it would give us a better understanding on life origin and maybe extraterrestrial life.

So at the very least I wouldn’t say it’s yet another conspiracy theory or dramatized news.

As mentioned by ChatGPT (so be cautious with that assertion) even if we created this kind of mirror life it would probably die quickly without the “mirror nutrients” existing anywhere?

I didn’t watch that video yet but Anton Petrov is a fairly reputable science commenter.

Again, I only did a quick pre-research before diving more in the subject. Do your own research.

Don’t lie to people it’s impossible to sugarcoat it, especially midair.

I’m confused by this Birds aren’t real book.

Is it satire? Is it a “real” conspiracy that real people believe in?

And yeah in this timeline both options are possible even simultaneously.

No bundle deal?

What I find surprising in the debate about AI and hallucinations is that everyone points the fact that’s it’s very dangerous and it will spread misinformation… But the problem is the inability or unwillingness to fact check our information.

Nobody wants to fact check something they saw on meta or tik tok. Nobody will. There is no difference between someone trusting some random influencer and someone trusting an AI. They are both set to fail the same way. Both lack critical thinking.

Instead of being afraid of AI and hallucinations we should be investing massively in teaching the newer generations on fact checking and critical thinking.

IA is a great assistant but only if you can fact check it. If you can’t or won’t then it’s a terrible assistant that will set you up to fail.

To be clear, I also struggle to fact check stuff and I definitely was misinformed many times in the past. Nobody is really immune to that problem. IMO IA doesn’t change much about that problem.