Nope. I don’t talk about myself like that.

  • 0 Posts
  • 49 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle
  • Right but my point is they would just submit the request to the host server. If the original is taken down then all the federated service will lose the comments as well.

    Not how federation works. Let’s take a lemmy post as an example. If a server is federated with another and a new post is made, all subscribed servers are notified and a copy of the item is sent in that notification. If the original is “taken down” the copies still exist on the other servers and any deletion event is in ALL of their modlogs. ANY instance can “undelete” or revert the removal, or just ignore the deletion request all together (or roll back the database, or any number of operations to revert a change). The items doesn’t just go away. The “origin” doesn’t have all that much power to force other listening servers to do anything.

    This also extends to comments. I run my own small instance with me and a few friends. My server never had serious downtime because it’s just us. Our access to larger instances never “vanished” even as their sites went completely down. The local content is effectively cached regardless of the state of the origin server.

    If the host server just straight up ignores turkey then they’ll block all servers that host Mastodon

    Good luck with that… There’s a lot of servers that can talk the same federation protocol. You’re not going to get them all. Forget all the normal means of bypassing blocks… you have so many fediverse and threadiverse servers to attach to in order to access largely similar content.




  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldIYKYK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Nope, it wasn’t… Even then though, the game is old enough that we can no longer assume that people have even played the game anymore. Kids are using the internet that would have been born after FO:NV. There are likely some 20 year olds on this site that have never played it because they would have been too young.





  • They can also crawl this publically-accessible social media source for their data sets.

    Crawling would be silly. They can simply setup a lemmy node and subscribe to every other server. Activitypub crawler would be much more efficient as they wouldn’t accidentally crawl things that haven’t changed, but instead can read the activitypub updates.


  • You using crypto to buy your toilet paper is not a mass scale use case and it is irrelevant.

    So then you claim that being able to buy stuff isn’t a “mass scale” use case…

    You realize that’s fucking stupid right?

    As I said, I can and do buy things regularly (though “rare” comparatively with the normal fiat purchases) with crypto. Other’s can do with me as well as the sites that I do it on do it as well. I can prove that by looking at the block chain and seeing the traffic in their wallets.

    So “way to go man!” Unless you actually have something more meaningful than “nuh uh”. You’re kind of full of shit.

    Edit: Lack of “big” vendors doing it != not possible at mass scale.

    Dell at one point accepted crypto. They stopped because of regulation, not because of technical limitation. And sites like Newegg still accept it.


  • Over the 15+ years that we’ve had crypto, there have been only two viable uses. All others have failed:

    Criminal activity (including brutal stuff like enabling NK/Russia and drug cartels)
    Financial speculation (in of itself often a malicious activity where the goal is to dump your worthless bags on a mark)
    

    Huh, Weird… Every use I’ve ever used crypto for doesn’t fall into these two categories. So I guess your assumptions and thus everything you based your logic/responses on must be faulty and incorrect.

    I use Crypto much like I use my second language/citizenship. Rarely… However, that doesn’t mean I don’t use it legally. And simply holding onto the crypto != financial speculation. Nobody treats a savings account as “financial speculation”.

    I’ve paid for plenty of things from my crypto wallets. Ranging from several to thousands of dollars.

    And yes, I would like my payment for toilet paper and bell peppers to be private. Strictly for the fact that I don’t want Mega-corpo stores to be able to track and advertise to me based on my payment method. “Club cards” to advertise/track you are a thing. Large chains can do this same thing with payment methods details. So yes, being “real” here, I not only require it, but demand it.

    Your premise is bad. And based on your other responses you don’t care to address it at all.


  • yes. windows xp was a fully local OS, and when you installed it, you stilled owned your computer. these things are not true of windows 10.

    Yes you can? It’s windows 11 that tries to lock you out, and even then you can install it without internet if you know the magic incantation…

    But windows 10 will just install with a local account if you don’t give it internet (unplug ethernet and never setup a wifi).

    sure, and I could say you’re a chainsaw juggling pedophile lizard person who came from the future to make sure flavored foams don’t have a resurgence in upscale dining at any cost because the consequences, drawn out 200 years, are so much worse than fascism and several possible extinction events. saying shit is easy. doesn’t make it true.

    The fuck? Any linux install will eventually become unsupported. That is my claim to counter your nonsense claim of Windows becoming unusable.

    Go take your pills.




  • You are not getting a 3 dimensional location. That’s why GPS coordinates only exist on 2 planes. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

    Proven wrong, as it’s a “2d” map that only exists on a 3d plane. It’s a slice of space that represents the moving target of “ground level”. The point that this is a problem to take it as just a “2d map” is that you can’t take 3 point readings from on top of a 1000 ft cliff and 3 feet away at the bottom of a cliff and expect 3 point measurements to actually give you accurate measurements since it’s just “2d” right? Elevation matters as it needs to be accounted for during the calculations.

    So which coordinate accounts for elevation? Latitude or Longitude?

    Where elevation = ground. As stated…

    Then you assert.

    It’s like you’re making my point for me.

    Which was in response to a post stating that the watch would need a 4th satellite or “elevation” in order to get a valid GPS value.

    And after I further clarified for you how it works… again… and that I was NOT making your point. I assumed you simply didn’t understand the point I was actually making.

    My point, exactly

    No… It wasn’t your point at all because you asserted that GPS is 3 point triangulation. When it’s 4 point Trilateration which only has the option of 3 point when the fourth value of elevation is already known, which the vast majority of devices that use GPS don’t know.

    What have I straw-manned? Can you point to it? What part of GPS needs 4 nodes/data points is vague?


  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comtoTechnology@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Clearly you didn’t… You keep asserting false statements that have already been disproven with sources.

    But ultimately it’s the same thing. You need 4 pieces of input. Either 3 satellites AND elevation. Or 4 satellites.

    If a watch doesn’t “know” elevation (barometer or other sensor providing such information) as the fourth data point… Then it NEEDS 4 satellites to make the data points whole. Making your statements yet again wrong. I’ve covered the cases… but you keep pushing false statements like “gps is triangulation” (completely incorrect) or “GPS uses 3 satellites” which is also only correct in one very specific case… Where it’s largely 4 or more, with reality being more like as many satellites as the device can read the pulses for. Often being a dozen or even more…

    I am making accurate and complete statements. You are the one peddling misinformation.

    Hell to prove the point… my time server grabs GPS as it’s primary source. It grabs up to 12 satellites to sync time. It shows me my sync status for lat/long as well… At 3 satellites it CANNOT get a lock for location OR time. At 4 it gets a weak lock.



  • A watch… or other simple gps device doesn’t know what the elevation is.

    Only one of the 2 selected points in a 3 satellite setup will be valid. And your device would have no idea which one is valid without elevation knowledge or a 4th satellite. Some devices can figure it out with just 3 satellites. Many/most won’t. But ultimately it’s the same thing. You need 4 pieces of input. Either 3 satellites AND elevation. Or 4 satellites.

    So no. I’ve not made a point “for” you. You’re just ignorant or specifically being obtuse on something you clearly don’t understand.