It doesn’t completely work that way, just like for humans. Sometimes feeding pets less is just subjecting them to pretty severe discomfort and hunger, while their metabolism is deciding that food is scarce so they better hoard every calorie they can spare. I know it’s significantly urgent to help them lose weight because of the health impacts, but IDK that it is super simple once you’ve decided to try to make it happen.

Oh… yeah, that makes more sense than “decrypting” it to inspect it.

Anyway, I think I’ll delete the article, I think you’re right and it is unuseful.

Hm, I think you are right. Looking at it again, there’s also this:

For one, enterprises largely disable QUIC and force websites like Google to downgrade back to TCP. This is because there’s only a single firewall vendor that can decrypt and inspect QUIC traffic (Go Fortinet!).

I definitely don’t think that is how it works. Maybe enterprises disable QUIC, but it’s not because they can decrypt and inspect HTTPS traffic.

Yeah. It feels like the issue is that really solving it is hard work (you can feel, with the proliferation of Linux/Windows runtimes that get downloaded behind the scenes for Steam, how much effort they’re continuously putting into releasing new runtimes that make slight adjustments for particular issues), and organizations like Ubuntu are always tempted into these kind of “we’ll just set up a simple system that means we don’t have to work on it because it’ll be solved” approaches.

Honestly I think Linus is being a little over simplistic about how easy it would be to create ABI compatibility in userland. In the kernel it’s realistic, but in userland it would be hopeless. But he’s not wrong that the current situation, however it arrived, is pretty crappy from a POV of wanting to ship something to people outside of the distro’s package management, and IMO none of the solutions that have come along since then are effective at solving the problem.

When did he discuss OnePackage or any other packaging project?

terrible for developers

He brought up specific things from the POV of working on subsurface where Linux made things a lot more difficult for them than every “consumer” operating system.

I worked on the packaging projects he is discussing.

Which packaging projects? I don’t even remember him talking about particular projects (aside from Debian itself), just about the general landscape of the problem and the attitudes of distro makers that have created it.

AppImage at the time was essentially the same thing as he was aiming for, but it has some security drawbacks. He hated them. He wanted to be them.

Post this talk, Flatpak came out, which is an improvement on the AppImage premise, but has layers, so uses less disk…in theory. He hated it.

I notice neither of these has made all that much of an impact. I have never in my life used either one of them or been encouraged to by anyone else, it has always been package management, or Docker, or pick your binary tarball, or curl | sudo sh and cross fingers.

He wants the unattainable technical solution just like every other developer.

He attained two totally separate attainable technical solutions which solved massive problems in the tech ecosystem and shape the landscape of computing today (one-and-a-half, GNU deserves quite a bit of credit.) I happen to agree mostly with his judgement on this particular problem, so it’s easier for me to see it that way, but I definitely would not dismiss out-of-hand his judgement on the right way to approach significant problems.

Steam I think is probably the closest thing to “right” for the problem he was describing. You pick your app, it downloads and then it works. There’s some behind-the-scenes nonsense involved, but it is in actuality hidden from the end-user, in a way that it is not in any of the “we fixed the Linux desktop!” solutions I have seen that are in actuality just another instance of XKCD 927. I was actually really pleased that he brought up Valve since that was the example that came to mind when he was laying out the problem.

I think it is okay if Linux is bad on “the desktop,” honestly. The world needs tractors and consumer-grade cars. They both have use cases. If what you need is a tractor, and you’re comfortable with the fact that it’s not going to work like a car, then a tractor will do things that are totally impossible with a Hyundai Elantra. That doesn’t mean we need to make tractors just as user-friendly as cars are, so that people can have one vehicle that does both. It is okay for some things to have a learning curve. But I think the example of the difficulties they had with subsurface are really significant things, it’s not just a question of “oh yeah it works different,” there are things that are just worse.

I think something like Arch or NixOS is probably the closest to “right” at this point. There is still a learning curve, so maybe not for everyone, but it’s manageable and things aren’t set up in gratuitously difficult ways. Maybe Bazzite, based on what I’ve heard, but I have not tried it so IDK.

I do too, clearly as does Linus. He’s just talking about some of the issues that prevent it from getting adopted by the normies.

Why not just replace it with a cap that isn’t a flip-top? Screw it on tight, squeeze the bottle slightly before putting the cap on so there’s a slight negative pressure. That would be my first thing to try.

So the bottle doesn’t break, it just pops open? This still sounds like a packaging issue. Maybe unstopper / squeeze / stopper the bottle, so it’s got negative pressure. Maybe replace the cap with some other more permanent type of cap (one that doesn’t have a little flip-top, if the ones they’re including do, just a solid cap and then ship the flip-top one alongside it)? IDK. How is it coming apart in transit? It’s not literally the plastic bottle breaking, is it?

This has got to be the packing, not the bottle. I have never heard of a bottle being shipped that suddenly broke on its own, without impact with its environment being the issue.

[email protected]

Partial plate matches and fuzzy matches exist for this reason, I don’t think this would protect you if you were genuinely doing serious crime. I looked into the guy a little more, he’s standing up against corruption of the NYPD which is a pretty important defense of the social contract (and apparently he’s gotten cited and threatened for it, because the NYPD doesn’t feel like it should have to follow the law.)

Apparently it’s true:

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/17/nyregion/license-plate-vigilantes.html

Presumably, what was happening was that NYC cops and city employees just didn’t get tickets, but then with the automated cameras, the computer didn’t know that it was supposed to give free passes to cops, and so they started bending their plates so they could keep their above-the-law status. Which is what prevents them from getting in trouble for having a defaced plate.

Fuck the NYPD, in other words

Citation?

My first thought was “that might not be a bad idea the way things are going, just so the feds don’t know where I am going at all times.” My second thought is that I’m genuinely a little bit surprised that Flock cameras don’t auto-flag this stuff and send a notification for the person to be pulled over.

If you defaced your plate into another plate that was also in the DB, then maybe you’d be fine, at least for a while.

I won’t say 100%, but they’re generally pretty good. Big ones I can think of:

• They’re going to apply every attack against Kamala Harris that they did against Biden
• Trump is going to be infinitely worse for the Palestinians even than Biden was

The first is a little bit qualified I guess. I was somewhat against replacing Biden for that reason (definitely before the debate), which was absolutely a mistake. But I think in retrospect, the way that they were able to blame Kamala Harris for Gaza and inflation and make it work was pretty spot-on to what I predicted.

The second one, people were furiously telling me how wrong I was, how impossible it would be for anyone to be worse than Biden, and in early days saying that Trump had achieved a cease-fire and it was just proof of how easy it would have been if only Biden had put some slight effort to it.

What I used to do when I lived in an area with a decent number of homeless people, was offer to get them some food, if I had the time for it. I’d walk somewhere with them, say what do you want I’ll grab it for you, and come out and hand it to them. It was honestly a little bit awkward to do it without feeling like a ponce, making conversation with the person or whatnot feeling condescending, but whatever.

I would say the majority would discount the suggestion. I didn’t feel the slightest bit bad saying no you can’t have any money then. A minority would be really into the idea and clearly fucking light up at the idea of having their hands on a sandwich. Those dudes I felt like it was important that they get their sandwich.

I also knew a guy who used to be homeless, volunteered with homeless services and substance abuse programs and etc, spent a ton of time on it. He never gave money on the street. He got very bitter about the subject, he just said that it doesn’t help them. Make of that what you will, I don’t really know the ins and outs, but that’s what he said.

What kind of endorsement is that lmao