But also, the evidence that that guy mostly used in his books is “That’s what I recon this week”, not something scientific.
But also, the evidence that that guy mostly used in his books is “That’s what I recon this week”, not something scientific.
No, I’m trying to set some expectations. The right thing to do is to probably lawyer up and try to go after the company. But it almost certainly wouldn’t do anything, and it will be long, expensive, and ultimately pointless endeavor, best case scenario the company that hates you now will be forced to employ you.
There is a thing that people invented some time ago, it’s called lying. It allows for example for you to say something and then later pretend you didn’t say it. Wild stuff.
Well, just a gap in the resume might mean you took yourself a sabbatical of sorts. But driving an uber means you were desperate for cash and needed a job, but wasn’t able to secure one in your main field. That’s sus.
It wasn’t. But the thing is, it’s only illegal if it’s the official reason for rejection. They can tell you in your face that they’re discriminating you, but you can’t do shit about it unless you get it in writing
But the stated reason for refusal will be “we have found a candidate that better fits the position”
Depending on your career, this might be worse than not doing anything
Nobody uses Teams voluntarily. It’s always imposed by corporate.
Skype was the term for skyping. It’s like buying a social media that coined the term tweet and changing it’s name to a letter. Stupidest shit ever.
Nobody has to decipher anything. Everyone is taught from childhood about the most important signs, everyone grasps basic rules and exceptions, and when you learn how to drive, you learn and memorize more obscure sings, and then you just know them, no deciphering needed. It’s the same both in America and in the rest of the world.
You seem to think that American signs are intuitive and not require learning, but that’s not true, it’s just you’re familiar with them, you know the rules and so it’s easy for you.
Vienna convention signs are usually avoiding conveying information via text. Other than stop sign, for historic reasons I guess. Text might be present, but it’s usually supplementary to the sign itself, and doesn’t do anything by its own.
Our “do not enter” looks like this
Well, voting in primaries is more than most people are doing already, but it isn’t exactly what I meant.
I am talking more about strategic things people don’t understand. They believe that them throwing out their vote means something other than giving up the power to the conservatives. They believe that giving power to conservatives somehow helps propagating progressive ideas. They believe in magical thinking of “I ticked the box, where is my cookie”. They completely forget about local elections.
Then they say braindead shit like “if I vote third party in a swing state it will help my goal” with no shred of irony.
That’s not how democracy in your country works. And because a bunch of people also don’t know that, you are in that situation.
Unless you learn how it works and will start working on it with this knowledge, you will indeed be unhappy, but it’s nit government’s fault, it’s yours for not educating yourself.
Those are pictograms, they aren’t “logical”, it’s a language, it can’t follow a logic. It’s like me saying that “road sign” is an illogical name, we all know it’s Verkehrsschild.
Us system makes better use of shapes, colors, and slashes to be more explicit
US system uses a lot of text, which is unquestionably bad. Also, it uses more slashed singes, which has upsides, it is indeed more intuitive, but also downsides, it’s more cluttered.
But it doesn’t really matter because you need to learn the system in any way, there isn’t one that is just intuitively known, and you have to learn both of them. And in this case I would prefer one that is more widely adopted.
The magic of Tesla was that they’re constantly iterating on the same model. The first 1000 teslas and the last 1000 teslas have nothing in common, not a single part. I don’t know how it is now, I stopped caring when Elongated started to show his true colours, but before that Tesla’s model actually had merit and gave them huge advantage.
He is evil, and he is intimidating
Distro isn’t important, for a novice user the defference, basically, is what software is in the official repository, and how easy it is to google shit. Unless you chose something very obscure somehow, you’ll be fine.
There is a very lovely pattern I see. Every time there is a conversation on the internet, everyone totally always voted and participated and canvassed and run and also fed the homeless at the same time, and every time there are any elections upcomming, there is no end to the constant anti-democracy messages about how voting is pointless and nobody should do that because both sides.
In the end, around 20% of registered voters are voting in democratic primaries, and I repeat my thesis, every time the nominee was the person who got the most votes, every time. So the answer to your question - they already care what you think, and if more people were agreeing with you, then maybe they would do what you want. So far they’re doing what majority of voters wants, and that’s not on the shadowy democratic demons, it’s on majority.
For the whole history of democratic primaries, the nominee was always the one that received the most votes. It probably of doesn’t have to be, but it always is.
“they” in question are people of America who know more than nothing about how democracy in their country works.
Progressives are going to bitch and moan about how nobody does what they want, but will refuse to participate in the very process designed to ask them what they want.
It’s almost like some idiots on the internet don’t want change, they want to be oppressed.
That’s just shitty people. Find people who you vibe with, and then interact with them.