I think we should resolve cheating concerns by banning technology at the Olympics. No drugs, no prosthetics, no shoes, no clothes, no cooked meals. Once you arrive at the Olympic village, it’s nuts and berries in the nude until the ceremony is over.

You can have access to whatever technology is absolutely necessary for the sport, like guns if the sport is shooting.

Well that’s true. It’s just that anarchists prefer the centrist party over the openly fascist party, because we don’t want to live in a fourth reich.

Sure. We Antirealists have a manifesto at http://soulism.net/

Reality was invented by fascist old men in Europe. Belief in reality is fundamentally fascist.

Musk’s mental disorder is autism. And if someone were looking at this here meme and saying “Yeah, that’s how all autists act”, we’d call that person a bigot. Because they are.

The reason sympathy and mental disorder ought to be correlated, is because the DSM exists to identify patients in need of treatment. The purpose of a diagnosis is to help someone. To give them easier access to medical treatment. Therefore, saying Trump has NPD is helping him. You shouldn’t do that, he’s a nazi!

No, NPD is a social disability that causes great distress to the patient. Trump is not socially impaired and is not distressed by his ego, so it’s not NPD.

Here’s a decent litmus test for whether someone is disabled or an asshole: if you can feel sympathy for them, can see that the whole world is against them, if you feel sorry for them and want them to be helped, it might be a disability. If they’re a famous politician and billionaire with millions of fans, they’re not disabled, they’re an asshole.

Very hard to believe you’re an atheist when you go around charitably reinterpreting words like the most racist megapastors.

You backpedalled the opposite of that. After realising you’d gone too far.

Right, you insinuated psychosis and then changed it to a nonspecific accusation of mental illness

See, that’s another contradiction. First you accuse me of psychosis and say my disbelief in reality is mental illness. But now you’re saying it’s all intentional, I’m not experiencing a different reality than you, I’m just lying about it to try and make you think you’re crazy. Sorry, but wouldn’t the person who called me mentally ill for disagreeing be the one who’s trying to convince me I’m crazy? You know, the definition of gaslighting? Wouldn’t you be the gaslighter for telling me I’m psychotic?

No, it means you’re being inconsistent. A day ago you said if I didn’t experience the same reality as you, if I thought reality wasn’t real (objective), I must be mentally ill. How do you square this contradiction?

I know we don’t experience the same universe. But realists won’t accept that fact.

An objectively extant universe which we experience

It’s someone who believes in reality. That’s not you?

Good thing it’s not a lie then. You’re a religious realist.

You have a religion.

It’s a screenshot of you saying people who disagree with your religion are mentally ill, because realism is your religion. The absolute lack of critical thinking is astonishing.

lies lies lies yeah

You literally said that me not sharing your religion is a symptom of mental illness. You don’t accept reality? If that’s true, you’ve done a great deal of personal improvement in the last day. Maybe you’re ready to give up realism.

You’re a realist. You worship reality. It’s only been said a dozen times in this thread. You’re just denying that you’ve heard it like you deny the rest of science.