MaggiWuerze

You could’ve also talked to them about it. Ghosting is such an asshole move, making them question whether it was their fault, when in reality you just reached the conclusion that you want to spend your free time differently

Okay, while that was disturbing to see… I for sure thought that was about the guy that turns tree into icecream and eats it out of a bowl made from the same tree

I was sure this had to be satire… Oh boy

I mean, yeah… On the other hand it shouldn’t really edit a link you want to share, should it?

You’re exactly the kind of Jellyfin user the rest has to thank for the devs lax approach to security. If you actually demanded even basic security, the devs would maybe at least consider it a priority.

But until it no longer provides an unsecured API, you should maybe think about whether you want to portrait it as secure.

Jellyfin holds no sensible data.

Maybe if you don’t live in a country where piracy is actively prosecuted

And Plex is not easier to install and secure than Jellyfin.

You can literally start a Plex server from a exe on desktop windows. Don’t make a fool out of yourself.

Also it is immensely more secure, unless with “Jellyfin” you actually mean “Jellyfin plus a myriad of convoluted extra steps every user has to take by themselves since the devs can’t be arsed to follow basic standards for web security”

My comment, that you answered first to, was about the way the Jellyfin devs would not react the same way to a security incidence, since they do not care about it (or at least don’t see it as important).

Also, the decentralized nature of Jellyfin does not mitigate such attacks, since you don’t need the users credentials to begin with

I don’t mean to come across as confrontational, but, maybe stop defending it then? You can keep using and liking the software while still holding the devs accountable for what is basic modern web security.

If all the Jellyfin users I saw acknowledging the issues actually stopped acting like it was a non issue, maybe the Jellyfin devs would do something about it.

Lidl sells these breaded camembert. You stick them in the oven until their top lifts, then you eat them with red whortleberry jam. Its basically half a kilo of molten cheese and jam, but it’s great

Which is the exact mindset that enables Jellyfin devs to not fix those issues, congratulations

Yeah, me as well. I have a Jellyfin configured and ready to go, but since I share my Plex with a lot of users, half of whom would be turned off by the need of a vpn, I won’t switch until they’ve sorted their shit out.

and more about there being no effort made to make Jellyfin secure.

That’s exactly it. And I feel the devs found that their users don’t care or will even defend it, so they won’t tackle it and avoid the problems that come with a rewrite of parts of their api. Plex gets flag for not adding quality of life features people want for the media player, but Jellyfin gets a pass for actual security issues.

Love you for still trying. I don’t know how often I’ve written the same comment. They simply don’t care.

Good luck getting a similar reaction to the myriad of security issues Jellyfin has

How do you think DDG ‘skips the SEO stuff’? They don’t have their own index, they are a meta search engine and the indices they rely on are subject to SEO efforts of the various pages

Its about sending the takedown request in the first place, not the company complying with it. Its an entirely, automated process with no regard to validity

If Greg say he wants to be an alligator, all I can do is support him

Thats not me, thats my pet alligator

amateur, I’m just not home

Got a Link for the air ducts and would they fit an Ender 5 Plus?

It was broadly assumed, since it was a welcome boost for them, but it was never confirmed