That depends entirely on what you want to print/design.
If it’s organic forms (Think characters, decorative objects, etc) then something like Blender would suit your need.
if you want to go more technical (machines, precision parts) then you’d use one of the various CAD tools, e.g. FreeCAD, TinkerCad or Fusion360
I really hope its Sony. Maybe it will even be available for my 1VI…
My dog is a 13 years old couch potato. He gets angry when I try to get him outside while its still dark :D
As a dev, me too
You dont care if someone lives or dies unless you know them?
No, they don’t care if someone lives or dies unless they bone them
lol, so we’re gonna get another Hitlerbot in their attempt to move the bot away from the reality it learned from its training data?
Just because you’ve talked yourself (or more probably, were talked into it by your parents) into this bullshit, doesn’t mean the rest of us has to do the same. If you feel like you need SkyDaddy™ to live your life than go ahead. The rest of us tries to live a good life for the sake of doing the right thing and not because some mysterious entity threatens us into compliance.
Deterministic ones
We could lower the entire lunar surface by several meter and not have a dent in the tidal effect
If it were sensibly prized I would have no issue with paying for YouTube. But seeing as they almost ask for the same as Netflix and co while not producing any content, I decided for the adblocker instead
You could’ve also talked to them about it. Ghosting is such an asshole move, making them question whether it was their fault, when in reality you just reached the conclusion that you want to spend your free time differently
Okay, while that was disturbing to see… I for sure thought that was about the guy that turns tree into icecream and eats it out of a bowl made from the same tree
I was sure this had to be satire… Oh boy
I mean, yeah… On the other hand it shouldn’t really edit a link you want to share, should it?
You’re exactly the kind of Jellyfin user the rest has to thank for the devs lax approach to security. If you actually demanded even basic security, the devs would maybe at least consider it a priority.
But until it no longer provides an unsecured API, you should maybe think about whether you want to portrait it as secure.
Jellyfin holds no sensible data.
Maybe if you don’t live in a country where piracy is actively prosecuted
And Plex is not easier to install and secure than Jellyfin.
You can literally start a Plex server from a exe on desktop windows. Don’t make a fool out of yourself.
Also it is immensely more secure, unless with “Jellyfin” you actually mean “Jellyfin plus a myriad of convoluted extra steps every user has to take by themselves since the devs can’t be arsed to follow basic standards for web security”
My comment, that you answered first to, was about the way the Jellyfin devs would not react the same way to a security incidence, since they do not care about it (or at least don’t see it as important).
Also, the decentralized nature of Jellyfin does not mitigate such attacks, since you don’t need the users credentials to begin with
I don’t mean to come across as confrontational, but, maybe stop defending it then? You can keep using and liking the software while still holding the devs accountable for what is basic modern web security.
If all the Jellyfin users I saw acknowledging the issues actually stopped acting like it was a non issue, maybe the Jellyfin devs would do something about it.
Usually the electric cars with a larger motor are also more efficient, since the motor does not have to run near its peak all the time.