Don’t you do that to beaker sir!
- 0 Posts
- 20 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
1·3 days agoThat. Isn’t. How. Laws. Work.
Start there and work your way up I guess.
The platform isn’t creating revenue, the traffic and data collection do however create lots and lots of revenue so it really just depends on how you want to parse out their financial situation.
Because they aren’t private.
Name alone is not in itself pii but membership specifically is not private unless it’s in their privacy policy.
Because that’s not how the law works bud.
Awesome, point to one that says membership rolls are protected. You can’t find a law and you can’t be original, why am I not surprised.
It started they aren’t private.
It’s not illegal guy.
I have. You want me to have you a law that tells you what you can do, those don’t exist at all. No law says what you can do. The fact you can’t find a single law that states it is illegal is the best evidence that it is not in fact illegal. Surely if it’s so correct you are beyond reproach that we must simply take it on your word you could easily provide evidence to back your position… You haven’t because you can’t.
Grow up.
There’s not it establishes they are not protected and are in fact releasable.
Laws don’t tell you what you can do they tell you what you can’t do. Point to a law that says you cannot release membership rolls, you won’t find one and the fact you still haven’t says oh so much.
Citing a source? No, that’s one more step then you’ve done huh? Let’s see your citation perry Mason.
Unless it’s explicitly exempted in policy, companies are held to their own privacy policy federally. You should actually read what I write rom.
We know they can be released because of the unamerican acts commission specifically requesting membership rolls and the subsequent supreme court case saying they can be disclosed.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/disclosure-of-membership-lists
There are federal rules of disclosure as to 501c3 and charitable organizations but pornhub and in fact most businesses are not 501c3 nor charitable.
Is not strange at all you’re adding me to prove a negative that can’t be proven.
We just went over that again for the third time no you can’t. Your name and membership is not pii.
Awesome point to one that allow l makes it unlawful federally.
Ed: you’ll notice I didn’t say they would, nor that they could just that it isn’t federally illegal to do.
Yet you can provide it, weird huh. Rule of acquisition #237 of they can’t point to a law, there is no law. Do better rom.
You cannot publish personally-identifiable information about your customers.
We already went over this, protected information is unsurprisingly protected. Your name and membership is not pii in most cases unless protected by their privacy policy.
They absolutely can if it isn’t included in the policy, there is no federal law protecting membership rolls. None.
Laws prevent they do not allow, you’re asking for something you know doesn’t exist to avoid having to admit you can’t find a single law that says it is illegal dispite arguing at length that it is.
Yeah, he signed a 44 billion dollar deal as a joke, then he tried to get out of it when he said he didn’t mean it.
signed a 44 billion dollar deal
he tried to get out of it when he said he didn’t mean it.
signed a 44 billion dollar deal
Then he got fined another 2 million dollars for sending the judges his dick pics after the judges wouldn’t let him back out.
Sex crimes, hilarious jokes huh?! Better hope he doesn’t upgrade to pranks and start raping people.
Then after the sale went through, he did that photo op where he brought a kitchen sink and a toilet to the twitter building.
Dad jokes are relevant why?
How is stating what happened defending him?
Signing a legally binding contract is not a joke… He did something stupid and tried to save face with his fanboys and idiots that go “man make funny joke worth more than several countries. Haha funny man make me face hurt.”
Like legit how do you think you aren’t defending him.
Bingo. You need a contract that says your membership/username is included in the privacy policy. Barring that they’re free to release membership rolls as they please they just can’t release protected information.
It’s why multiple emails, VPN and phony personas are so prevalent these days.
Point. To. A. Single. Law.
One. Uno. A singular law.
No that actually happened boss.
I mean you do, that’s what the Chinese police operating in the United States thing is about.
Yes the fuck they can. Point to a single law that says they can’t.
I’d say the same to you.
The only thing that can’t release is what is protected. Ssid, dl, address, medical into, disability status, so on so forth.
Your membership is not protected at all in any way especially with porn sites you have no contract with you.
It’s fucking insane that you don’t know it’s both legal and happens constantly, there’s an entire industry and economy based on data scraping to find and release non protected information because of both profitable and legal.
Youd think a ferangi would know the rules of business at least we’ll enough to know what you can skirt and what you can’t rom of keldar.
Membership is not protected status, any company could publish their membership roll unless their agreements specifically say they cannot and that’s very rare.
They absolutely can publish non protected information and none of that is actually protected.
It’s not illegal at all, what are you talking about.
I mean he’s break dancing, break dancing isn’t political.