I told keeping wages in line with productivity do describe how it was before Reagan in the US. I didnt say its leftism.

Thats not manipulation. What I was trying to say was that the leftist movement should only be about economic inequality until we solve it. This is not manipulation since you would not be promising other groups of people anything else. So, your supporters would know that the only thing they will get will be economic equality in return of their support. So its not lying to anyone. I should tell you that being rich is awesome. Its the best thing a human being could ever ask for after health of course. Money is so great that it makes anything else unimportant. I can live a luxurious life without even moving a single finger. Im 22 and I have a total of 200k dollars in my account on different assets. This is just the amount i made from the money my parents gave me throughout my life to spend it with my friends. Now that I graduated from university, my father will give me my first house next month. it has 4 room and a very large house. So now Im asking you, do you think i would give a single fuck if someone was racist to me or sexist to me or anything else? NO. Because I have everything I want my ears wouldnt even hear what they are saying. Im writing this so that you can understand how important money really is.

So yes, we cannot strive for equality in all forms since as i said, the only class which will have the upper hand when united is the poor class against the rich. Any other weak side of any conflict will be weaker when united than the superior side. The only time the oppressed class will become majority against their oppressors when united is the working class people. For example, trans people will be less in numbers against non trans people, gay people will be less in numbers against non gay people. This will result in you pushing away those superior side people ive mentioned and thus, you will not be able to create a revolting group against the rich since those people you pushed away will start defending the rich. Why do you think so many young people voted for trump when they cannot even afford to have a family? Because the left of today failed to have the upper hand in terms of numbers by taking only minorities on their side and pushing the majority to the other.

Okay but by taking those allies into your movement, you end up pushing away a lot more people that would normally support you.

My family is extremely rich. My father is a contractor. So, I know how these companies think. I also studied management. The management will always talk about how they should care about environmental issues, gender issues, political correctness and always talk about how this will improve our reputation. This is also the same thing thought in university to me. However, you will never hear from none of them anything about economic inequalities. Never. I wrote this because I know how companies work and how naive the people are. For example, we arrange salesmen according to the traits of our customers. If the customer is a female, we arrange a handsome salesman. If she has colored hair or fat, we arrange a fat woman etc etc. You will not believe how naive people are.

Also forgot to mention that those who try breaking conflicts in other categories such as race, gender etc usually lose their focus on economic inequality. They will literally buy products from companies which support their views. My family is extremely rich and I dont buy anything except a few clothes that will be enough for a year once a year, eat salads and cook them myself. I dont order food from restaurants. Why? Because as i said, there are no companies that apply with my views since as i said, the only thing those companies will not go against is income inequality not even my own family company. I hope this will make it clear how most leftists lost their focus on economy.

Yeah I realized i can only post links there didnt know that so i deleted it. Im new here.

For your reply, as i said, I still think that money is the most important thing and a lot more important than taking the risk of dividing the left. I think every other category that has inequality among its members can be ignored if it is going to prevent breaking the economic inequality. So i think the left should accept anyone who wants to bring economic equality regardless of how discriminating or racist or any other thing they are. There is a reason why the only issue that corps dont want to be heard is economy. I dont get mad btw opinion is an opinion.

Dildoes and pocket pussies