Yup. I don’t think training should be considered breaking copyright. Regurgitating though should.
There are examples of use cases besides the right now obvious one of LLMs “creating” “original” content.
One that comes to my mind is indexing books. Allowing for people to search for books based on a description.
On the other hand, it is not the learning in your example that is illegal, but the recital.
If you learn ten books by heart and make money writing shitty fanfics, thats not necessarily illegal.
Not the article, the commenter before you points at a deeper issue.
It doesn’t matter how if your prompt tells it not to lie is it isn’t actually capable of following that instruction.
I assume they’re talking about the design and training, not the prompt.
if someone has ideas, I say let them cook. Open sourcing this can’t be bad for anyone imo.
Though I agree in a way, I don’t understand what anyone found potentially useful with this thing in the first place.
as digitized almost all societal functions are, we really should define basic internet access as a human right.
This varies from place to place. This is handled really badly in some places and much better in others.
hotels are controlled by laws and zoning, airbnb gets around that and turns planned living space into hotel space.
Appartment hotels maybe?
hotels/hostels?
Airbnb turns potential living space into hotel space and thereby helps driving up housing prices. The whole concept is inherently problematic.
this is true, but high quality doesnt mitigate the inherent limitations
thats the old generation, nowadays you want the faster LG BlueTooth Quick+
I’m not sure what you mean with intentional, but intentional as in they have built pipes out of lead, yes.
Funny how both ancient rome and modern US use lead in their water supply systems
is this loss?
syncthing is pretty great
You don’t need to be a journalist to copy/paste a title verbatim