Darmok and Jalad, on the ocean.

It is a point for them to coexist. It’s called plausible deniability.

What exactly are you trying to argue? That it’s not a good reason for a country to get a bunch of uranium without raising questions?

There was absolutely no incentive to research more about alternative fuels, uranium and plutonium were materials the nuclear powers wanted. For more than just 1 reason…

If countries REALLY wanted nuclear power without Uranium. They would have researched it. Like China have. But no one else has. Well some have, but they all gave up a long time ago.

Sweden was researching it, but decided to go with Uranium, coincidentally, they just happened to also research nuclear weapons… very strange coincidence that… (Sweden was later encouraged to halt all nuclear weapons research)

Yes. They compete for the same raw material. That’s the whole point. Gives you a perfectly good reason to excavate it.

It gives you a reason to access the materials you need for nuclear weapons.

Who is saying they’re using the fuel for reactors to make the weapons? Just you.

And not that I count it. But they do infact make weapons from spent uranium. They make artillery shells from it. Buy like I said. I don’t even count that.

US experiments were broken off because it gives no excuse to attain materials for nuclear weapons. Same excuse everyone else use.

It says each member will assist the attacked party/parties, as it deems necessary.

My interpretation of the article is that assistance is mandatory. What type of assistance is up to the member to decide

https://www.nato.int/cps/fr/natohq/topics_110496.htm?selectedLocale=en

The ones with the thin metal band that your hair always get caught in?

I remember the sound being worth the pain. Good looking too.

You see it as dismissive. Low effort reply, like they couldn’t be bothered. It’s not inviting continued conversation so you see it as someone telling you to stop talking to them.

If I were to guess. In your eyes. They might as well have replied with “cool story bro”.

Which is now forever a sarcastic term and no one regardless of what you say, will believe that you actually found their story cool.

It’s not the thumbs up in itself that is seen as rude, but the short dismissive affirmative.

Someone that sees it as rude would feel like they put effort into their message and expect some kind of effort back in the reply,

the single emoji response can also make it seem like you didn’t even care to read it, and just say replied with something to make them shut up.

I’ll bring the kamelåså and we get the party started

Kamelåså

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ykj3Kpm3O0g

Spectator.co.uk so mainstream its the first time I even hear about them.

What you linked is an opinion piece by an anonymous “author” with no sources or anything to back up any claim.

You’ll have to do better than that. Let’s not forget which one of us is a proven liar in this discussion. We all have the history to prove it

Your description of events doesn’t match reality. You just make up whatever sounds good and then tell people they’re the ones who need to prove you wrong.

Just like you made up that Zelenaky had canceled elections. I had to quote and link you the actual law, thrice, because you couldn’t comprehend what was written.

So much for your “knowledge”

Cute little mimic game you got going. Truly playing the part of a child.

The people have the power to elect governments. And the people have the power to oust governments. That is Democracy at display.

You’ve categorically been willfully ignorant and proven wrong throughout this entire discussion. Your meager attempts at insulting me over and over won’t change anything, and only exposes you for the manchild you are.

Article 19 has not been amended once since the document was released on the internet in 2015.

I’m sure you are aware of who the president of Ukraine was in 2015.

But like I said at the very start. Don’t let the facts get in the way of your propaganda.

Shit happens, mistakes are sometimes made. Valve once had code that could delete your entire drive.

I think maybe I wrote too much text for you to read. Let us look at what Article 19 says again.

In martial law, the following are prohibited: amending the Constitution of Ukraine; amending the Constitution of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea; holding elections of the President of Ukraine, as well as elections to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and local self-government bodies;

Wait. Let’s zoom in on that.

In martial law, the following are prohibited:

holding elections of the President of Ukraine

What was it you said again?

i see your reading comprehension is poor. It says nothing about elections being suspended.

You’re right. It doesnt say anything about them being suspended. It says they’re prohibited. Maybe you’d know that if you actually managed to read the words.

Something something reading comprehension?

The only one who is clueless here is you. It extends to the presidency.

But since you need to be educated on the matter. Here are their laws on the matter of Martial Law.

But don’t worry. You don’t need to read it all, I highlighted Article 19 and 10. And just for you. I also translated it. On the slight chance you don’t know any ukranian.

https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/389-19

Стаття 19. Гарантії законності в умовах воєнного стану

1. В умовах воєнного стану забороняються: зміна Конституції України; зміна Конституції Автономної Республіки Крим; проведення виборів Президента України, а також виборів до Верховної Ради України, Верховної Ради Автономної Республіки Крим і органів місцевого самоврядування;

проведення всеукраїнських та місцевих референдумів;

проведення страйків, масових зібрань та акцій.

Стаття 10. Неприпустимість припинення повноважень органів державної влади, інших державних органів в умовах воєнного стану

1. У період дії воєнного стану не можуть бути припинені повноваження Президента України, Верховної Ради України, Кабінету Міністрів України, Національного банку України, Уповноваженого Верховної Ради України з прав людини, Рахункової палати, судів, органів прокуратури, органів, що здійснюють оперативно-розшукову діяльність, досудове розслідування, розвідувальних органів та органів, підрозділи яких здійснюють контррозвідувальну діяльність.

And here it is in english.

Article 19. Guarantees of legality in martial law

1. In martial law, the following are prohibited: amending the Constitution of Ukraine; amending the Constitution of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea;

holding elections of the President of Ukraine, as well as elections to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and local self-government bodies;

holding all-Ukrainian and local referendums;

holding strikes, mass gatherings and rallies.

Article 10. Inadmissibility of termination of powers of state authorities and other state bodies during martial law

1. During the period of martial law, the powers of the President of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, the National Bank of Ukraine, the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, the Accounting Chamber, courts, prosecutor’s offices, bodies carrying out operational and investigative activities, pre-trial investigation, intelligence bodies and bodies whose units carry out counterintelligence activities may not be terminated.

So… what was that about me lying? Something about me not understanding what I’m talking about? That’s ok. You can apologize now and you might just look a little less stupid.

Would you mind reading that last sentence for the class out loud? Here. I’ll even highlight it for you.

In the event that the term of authority of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine expires while martial law or a state of emergency is in effect, its authority is extended until the day of the first meeting of the first session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine , elected after the cancellation of martial law or of the state of emergency.

The part called Article 83.