It garbles advertisers’ data as a result, but you must disable uBlock Origin to run it; they can’t work simultaneously. I recently moved to it and, so far, am never looking back!

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Google has put a lot of effort into detecting and blocking stuff like this. They call it “click fraud”, if you want to look it up.

    It’ll just mean they start ignoring clicks from you.

    • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Then that achieves the same goal. If they’re ignoring clicks from you, and you’re blocking their trackers, then they probably don’t have a good profile on you, because whatever they do have is either old, poisoned, or both.

      • cageythree@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        This feels like reverse psychology on a little kid.

        “That’s it, I’m not tracking you anymore! >:(”
        “Oooh nooo, what have I done! Oh how much I would wish to be tracked :(”
        “No, you won’t convince me to change my mind >:(”
        “Oh well, guess I’ll have to live without being tracked, what a shame that is.”

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      They call it “click fraud”,

      No, click fraud is using botnets to click ads in your site to increase your revenue.

        • lumony@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          They can still get money from this. In fact, they get more money from this than with uBlock.

          They recognize how it undermines the digital advertising system, so they did everything in their power to get rid of it before it takes off.

          We really should be recommending adNauseam instead of uBlock.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            OK… If trust is bro, then they won

            But I ain’t no middle schooler, so you need to explain like I am 5 how this solution is in fact superior to uBlock

            Is there any proper research on this?

        • lumony@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They can still get money from this. In fact, they get more money from this than with uBlock.

          They recognize how it undermines the digital advertising system, so they did everything in their power to get rid of it before it takes off. They’re fighting a generational war and don’t want us to even be aware of the tools we have to fight back.

          We really should be recommending adNauseam instead of uBlock.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not sure how true it was, but there was a YouTuber claiming that their videos were getting entirely demonetized because too many of their viewers had Ad blockers enabled. So even though 75% of people were seeing ads on the video, Google was keeping that ad revenue, withholding it all from the creator because 25% weren’t getting ads. The claim the youtuber made is that this will probably predominantly impact creators with a more tech savvy / privacy aware audience, resulting in less of that niche content.

        Anyway, this is anecdotal, but I wouldn’t put it past Google to pass the issue to the creators for the actions of their consumers, even though it’s not their fault.

        • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Creators who care about privacy should not support Google’s monopoly by using YouTube as their platform of choice.

          • DNU@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            legit, there are so many platforms out there, idc which one they use, but pretty please, just mirror your content. Why’s it so hard 😵‍💫. The group im referring to doesnt even have the “money ads” argument as what most small creators earn on yt is peanuts.

    • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Throw in a dash of track-me-not (https://www.trackmenot.io/) and maybe they’ll start ignoring your search queries too! Worst case my actual searches are so buried in the bs deciding what to market would be easier from my screen-name.

      • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        can confirm. You know those ‘google rewards’ things? they slowly stopped going for the results from trackmenot lol

        it was nice to get $1 a month off my VPN subscription lol