• Peffse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    One step above what I had back in 2012? What exactly does that say about progress in capacity?

    • commander@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s twice the amount you were complaining about, and there are bigger drives than the one I have.

      Edit: I just realized he’s probably talking about being stuck on 1tb compared to when we had 1gb drives. Then we had 100gb drives, then 500gb, then 1tb. He’s probably commenting on why we don’t have 100tb+ drives yet.

      That’s all I can think of, and my response would simply be there are diminishing returns to the exponential growth of hardware.

      • Peffse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        exactly. Thank you.

        Back in 2012 an affordable $40 flash drive was 1GB. Now $40 gets you a 512GB.

        $90 would have netted you a 2GB full-size SD card. Now you get a 1TB MicroSD with adapter

        $80 would get you 1TB in spinning rust in 2012… now, with $80 you get… 1TB or if you stretch the budget a little, 2TB. But what if you own a bunch of games like Ark Survival Evolved that take up 435GB of space? Shell out $649

        Back when I bought the 1TB, I installed the entire steam library I owned onto it. Now I can’t get more than 6-7 new titles installed. I’m ignoring how insanely fast drives have gotten over the years, but my complaint is storage.

        EDIT: For the sake of comparison outside my complaint of SSD sizing, spinning rust at $80 today is just 4TB at a lower 5400rpm instead of 7200rpm.