Here on Lemmy, I recently learned of a far-reaching conspiracy that by its nature involves bribing research scientists and their support staff across the globe to falsify their data and support the falsified data of others.
I was quite surprised, having worked as one for over a decade and never receiving a cent of my universal bribe income (UBI). I’ve filed grievances with requests for back pay from both ANSO and the ISC, but they’re denying any knowledge of it.
Anytime someone says science might be wrong I agree. It can be, but it is based on what we know so far and the scientific method lets us refine our understanding over time. Until more information is available, we work with what we know instead of throwing it out because it might not be perfect.
I can’t speak for the millions of videos on YouTube and I clearly haven’t watched as many science videos as the next guy, but I won’t rule it out entirely if the person backs it up with actual science. Psuedo science like RFK wasn’t something they cited on YouTube. Science must prove itself.
Science can be proven wrong… by more science. It’s not that hard of a concept.
Here on Lemmy, I recently learned of a far-reaching conspiracy that by its nature involves bribing research scientists and their support staff across the globe to falsify their data and support the falsified data of others.
I was quite surprised, having worked as one for over a decade and never receiving a cent of my universal bribe income (UBI). I’ve filed grievances with requests for back pay from both ANSO and the ISC, but they’re denying any knowledge of it.
You need to reply to that guy messaging everyone on Lemmy that’s seeing if anyone wants to join the illuminati
That’s because you need to join the Templars first, of course. LoL
Anytime someone says science might be wrong I agree. It can be, but it is based on what we know so far and the scientific method lets us refine our understanding over time. Until more information is available, we work with what we know instead of throwing it out because it might not be perfect.
Ergo, science 👐
Sure but if it is easily debunked in a youtube video by a kon scientist I wonder if we should be regarding that particular topic as science.
If you are in a position to criticize other people’s science, youtube is probably not the platform of choice.
I can’t speak for the millions of videos on YouTube and I clearly haven’t watched as many science videos as the next guy, but I won’t rule it out entirely if the person backs it up with actual science. Psuedo science like RFK wasn’t something they cited on YouTube. Science must prove itself.