Fox News caption: BY WINNING, DEMOCRATS ARE ACTUALLY LOSING

  • jballs@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    240
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Her argument is that more people will move to red states as a result. I hate to break it to her, but increased population density is almost guaranteed to make states turn blue.

    So by winning, Democrats are actually losing, making red states turn blue, so Democrats are winning. Suck it, commies!

    • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      98
      ·
      2 days ago

      Moving from blue to red again was a shock, I sure miss the quality of public services. This place is falling apart unless you live in the richest suburbs.

        • PKscope@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          2 days ago

          I live in Bumfuck, WV. Quite possibly the stupidest state in the Union. Our elected representation perfectly encapsulates the constituents of the state. Moronic, incompetent, and completely unwilling to incite change for a more prosperous future.

          I fucking hate it here. I can’t wait to be able to move.

      • SparkyBauer44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Preach brother. Had no idea, just wanted to move. Now I’m counting the days to get out of here. More money, better public services, cleaner, and COL isn’t much of an argument at this point. Although it wasn’t a big deal anyway. Rent caught up quick and the only perk is a front yard and backyard I don’t use except to walk the dog. Aside from that, it’s clear how far a few more dollars for state taxes go. Good learning experience. Loved the people, but no thanks to climate. Political and physical.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      Isn’t it conservatives that are leaving blue states? I know urban centers tend to be more left leaning but I don’t think those people will quickly change their views just from moving. Maybe their kids?

      • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Independent of left and right, a higher population density naturally results in increased support for public services, which the right has decided to firmly establish themselves as being against.

        Plus there’s the added benefit of prejudice and racism decreasing in a more diverse community. (at least on a personal level)

      • jballs@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        She doesn’t specifically mention conservatives moving. Her argument seemed to be that everyone will flee the socialist hellscape.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          which are often conservatives, Barring financial reasons, some left/dems to leave HCOL blue states like cali, but they are white so they will do fine in texas. not so much for POCs/lgbtq+ people.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Sounds like a college town, so I imagine it’s not at all indicative of the rest of the state, politically

        • MumboJumbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Columbia has one huge university and two good sized colleges. As far as Missouri goes, it’s probably the most liberal city. Take a drive for 10 minutes in any direction though and the atmosphere definitely changes.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve been to Columbia before. Supremely bizarre drive from St Louis to the campus. With any luck that’ll be my first and only time in Missouri

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        You get a lot of retirees who want to move South. Maybe they have family there, or maybe they just want nicer weather.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          A number of states specifically structured their tax policies to be super friendly to retirees, so some ran the numbers and said “oh I can afford to sell my expensive house up north, move south and buy a better/similar house for less and pay less taxes as I withdraw my retirement money? Also I don’t have to deal with winters anymore?! Sign me up!” And since they don’t have to worry about job availability they can live basically anywhere that has the amenities they want and fits their budget, thus the American south became a gigantic retirement community

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            arnt they still concentrated in BLUE counties in the south though. i had anext door neighbor that retired, financially they saw texas as a retirement state, so they moved there, Houston i believe, plus they are also white, and pretty much getting annoyed with non-whites(they were pretty subtle about and not express it openly)

            • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              See the one thing to remember is that places can be majority one party, but if consistently 60% of voter vote for one party that still means that 40% of the voters vote differently. There’s tons of moderates and Republicans in very blue areas and there’s tons of moderates and Democrats in red areas. Some of these retirees might be moderates or hold different opinions from where they live. They may even simply be folks who aren’t plugged into politics and don’t really know or care that much what their neighbors’ political opinions are.

              I’m overgeneralizing here, but retirees don’t work (especially not highly physical jobs that badly require workers rights reform. They might do some independent contracting for the last place they worked as a side gig though!) they don’t go to school, they don’t have much debt with their home, vehicles and student loans all paid off long ago, they don’t rent, they aren’t first time home buyers, they aren’t raising a family and struggling with the cost of daycare. Retirees are basically just trust fund babies except they spent the last 40 years building their own trust fund. And as people are living longer healthier lives, we’re getting retirees who have been retired for 20+ years and are even further disconnected from the needs of those who are still working and raising families

              My point is, depending on the person, politics probably isn’t a big deal to them when they select a low cost of living area to retire to. And in the south there’s tons of 55+ communities and communities intended for retirees that are conveniently built just outside of metro areas to reduce tax burden (because taxes are generally the biggest cost for retirees!)

      • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        also I’m pretty sure smaller stuff that’s not for the us president is not counted just purely per vote but more on winning districts so just having more conservatives collected in one area would only mean that a presumably an already very red area gets redder without doing anything more