• Pika@rekabu.ru
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Interestingly, it’s not about the look of genitalia specifically.

    For example, I happen to be a hetero person, yet I appreciate both genitals equally. What matters is how feminine the carrier is. I’ll appreciate a nice dick on a beautiful woman, but on a man…ew. Same with vaginas - if it belongs to a woman, it can be very arousing, but you won’t find trans men in my bedroom.

    It’s the same genitals, but their perception is wildly different.

          • Pika@rekabu.ru
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I like women, hence, I’m hetero. Shouldn’t be too hard.

            Now, you can make categories of dick lovers and vagina appreciators, but “hetero”, just as “homo” and the rest, refers to gender attraction, not genitals. No need to gatekeep that.

            I have no objection being called queer, but definitionally I’m just not.

            • undefinedValue@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              No it actually refers to sex, not gender. Gay for a man is loving dick, not loving males.

              Definitionally you aren’t hetero if you enjoy both sexual organs.

                • undefinedValue@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  It’s amazing that I’ve triggered you so much you’ve made assumptions on age. It’s unfortunate your brain rot can’t accept the dictionary’s definition:

                  Heterosexual: sexually or romantically attracted to people of the other sex.

                  I’m truly sorry they didn’t consult your feelings when writing the definition little snowflake