• chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That’s not a valid argument, since it can be used elsewhere. Using that argument would confirm any racist or sexist stereotype as well, since you know what they mean. Just because someone has heard let’s see, that Jewish people are lizard aliens who drink blood and adrenochrome from babies doesn’t mean there’s some truth to it.

    I’m not using the above as an argument against pit bulls having aggressive natures; I mostly stay out of that argument (though the one pit I remember was a lovely pup). I am saying that as an argument backing up the aggressive claim, it’s a bad one to use.

      • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        You might want to adjust your thoughts on the second. Studies have shown that pit bulls are associated with black people, and that people who have unfavorable views of black people, especially as being violent, also have a correlation to negative views of pit bulls. You can find one such study here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11213322/

        Question: “If you had to guess, do you think Black people or white people are more likely to own the following dogs?” Source: Pooled Lucid Surveys, June-July 2020, August 2021.

        Not everyone dislikes based on racial association, but to claim there is none only illustrates that your argument is both invalid and uninformed.

        • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Studies have shown that pit bulls are associated with black people, and that people who have unfavorable views of black people, especially as being violent, also have a correlation to negative views of pit bulls

          Not OP, but - this has nothing to do with racism, WTF are you talking about?

          “Studies have shown”… My god, studies have shown that a breed created for violence and bloodthirst has a higher probability of being violent and bloodthirsty than those that weren’t, that’s literally all the context there was!

        • crapwittyname@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That may be true in the US. Here in the UK there is no such correlation, and yet pitbulls here still cause more injuries and deaths than all other breeds combined. Odd, that.