• WALLACE@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “The greatest argument against democracy is a conversation with the average voter”

    • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I suggest you read La Haine de la démocratie from Jacques Rancière. It shows that the people are actually not retarded, and the narrative pushed against democracy has no practical foundation

      • Anomnomnomaly@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        A person can be smart… but when they start to group together, the avg intelligence declines and mob mentality takes over.

        • MNByChoice@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Outside of literal mobs, is that true?

          I get that groups of people make stupid decisions, especially committees. However, that seems more like “compromising to pointlessness” and redirecting energy away from useful action, than a “mob mentality”.

          • Anomnomnomaly@lemmy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think you’re describing ‘politicians’ more than people in general… diplomacy is when both sides are disappointed in the result. :)

          • sqgl@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Yes, when counting jelly beans in a jar or answering general knowledge questions because that has no ideology attached to it. But when people are desperate to belong they will follow the party line blindly lest they be ostracised.

            The answers to OP’s questions are all ideologically loaded.