Ok, can we just take a second to acknowledge the fact that you are trying to nitpick grammer in a debate about the moral and ideological quality of political groups. I really have nothing to say except for the fact that those kind of arguements have a history of being employed to try and undermine valid arguements by attacking the ‘intelligence’ of groups such as African-Americans to try and discredit their struggles and pain. (not trying to say it means that mine is more valid because you made that redirection, but please consider the implications of that tactic)
God come off it. Some people would rather have clearly written sentences and a correction is only an attack if you’re so fragile that anything would be.
No? Then is correct in that sentence.
Absolutely not. Than would be correct if the message wasn’t bullshit. Grammatically, then is wrong there.
Ok, can we just take a second to acknowledge the fact that you are trying to nitpick grammer in a debate about the moral and ideological quality of political groups. I really have nothing to say except for the fact that those kind of arguements have a history of being employed to try and undermine valid arguements by attacking the ‘intelligence’ of groups such as African-Americans to try and discredit their struggles and pain. (not trying to say it means that mine is more valid because you made that redirection, but please consider the implications of that tactic)
God come off it. Some people would rather have clearly written sentences and a correction is only an attack if you’re so fragile that anything would be.