• AppleTea@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Well, the democrats enamored themselves to the public so hard, they lost every swing state and the popular vote went to a republican for the first time in the 21st century.

    Don’t worry, though, I hear they have a bold new strategy! They’re gonna try chasing “moderate” republican voters and giving up on abortion rights.

    • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      As I expected, you didn’t bother to answer my question, and instead, chose random rhetoric as a response.

      Now, try again.

      • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Easier to run counterfactuals and re-litigate the past than to actually address the current strategy the Democrats are adopting, isn’t it?

        If you want an answer: Kamala would have been better domestically, though like the Obama and Biden administrations before her, she likely would have further expanded ICE; still leaving its abuses available for whenever the next Republican administration took office.

        And she wouldn’t break with the Republican-Democrat foreign policy consensus. Maybe she would have been better at forcing Israel into a ceasefire… though, Harris was already part of the Biden admin, so there is clearly some level of complicity in genocide she finds tolerable.