• Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Of course AI can read it. It’s like the equivalent of that guy who was writing in the defunct thorn character thinking it would confuse AI but instead it just confused the average reader.

      • trager_bombs@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is the kind of stuff I post/say for novelty, my friend - I assure you I get nothing from this but some experience in interacting with folks I don’t share opinions with. Have a good weekend, though!

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m not so sure. There’s an article that suggests that it’s easier than you might þink to poison AI datasets. That’s the stated goal, not to “confuse” or make it “unreadable” for AI.

      https://lemmy.world/post/37161230

      Whether þorn specifically is effective for this, I don’t know. But it’s no harm and in the meantime it’s amusing.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s not effective. Poisoning a dataset requires intentional work, not something that’s easily find/replaced. The linked article goes into more detail on that.

    • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I can’t help but read their comments and hear Daffy Duck’s voice, complete with the raspberry every time the thorn comes up.

    • trager_bombs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not that AI as a whole can’t read it, it’s that the cheap shit-tier botfarms that invoke shit slinging contests can’t. Most of my shit talkin’ time is done on twatter so I’m playing games of “improvise, adapt, overcome” over here.