Neat breakdown with data + some code.

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Most of this is being driven by renewables. Natural gas gets mentioned because its price has dropped due to fracking, but it’s not a strictly necessary part of this argument, either. Water/wind/solar solutions have undercut even the plummet in natural gas prices.

    Nuclear has no place. Nobody is building it, and it’s not because regulators are blocking it. It’s also completely unnecessary.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      58 minutes ago

      Nobody is building it

      France built the fuck out of it, 71% of their power is nuclear. Works darn well.

      it’s not because regulators are blocking it

      In the US, the over-regulation makes it horrifically expensive. Every plant is bespoke instead of mass produced, with exchangeable parts, personnel, and knowledge. Mass produce nuclear plants and the costs come way down.

      Water/wind/solar solutions have undercut even the plummet in natural gas prices.

      Wind and solar are paired with natural gas. People still want power in the winter and at night and right now that is natural gas. By opposing nuclear, you ensure it will continue to be natural gas paired with wind and solar.