Should OS makers, like Microsoft, be legally required to provide 15 years of security updates?

  • golli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Or an established player in the market that wants to keep competitors out (but I guess in a way that is someone who dislikes change). While legislation like this can sometimes be great (e.g. the recent changes forcing longer support for mobile phones) there comes a point where it cuts the other way and it becomes an entry barrier.

    Imo the better solution would be to legislate what happens after support ends. Like forcing the disclosure of at least some documentation that allows others to continue servicing the product or at least transfer out data and install other software on the device.