RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to cats@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoPikachupiefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.comexternal-linkmessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1971arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up1958arrow-down1external-linkPikachupiefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.comRmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to cats@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square97fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareEq0@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up31·1 day agoIt’s better than scientifically proven! They made cute videos out of it! Isn’t that obviously more trustworthy?
minus-squarebaines@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·1 day agoyou know what else was scientifically proven to work? sunscreen and yet corporations still managed to find a ways to fuck consumers on that I’m not saying you shouldn’t listen to actual experts, but lets not pretend even that is for sure safe and now how do you even check if something has side effects, AI slop will probably tell you to heat kitty in the microwave to remove fleas
minus-squarewintermute@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 day agoThere’s nothing wrong with sunscreen in general, but they are probably referring to what happened recently in Australia: Independent analysis by a trusted consumer advocacy group has found that several of Australia’s most popular, and expensive, sunscreens are not providing the protection they claim to, kicking off a national scandal.
minus-squareLyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 day agoAnd the lab issuing the fake results is based in the US :( …a single US-based laboratory had certified at least half of the products that had failed Choice’s testing, and that this facility routinely recorded high test results. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-04/questions-over-lab-that-tested-sunscreen-spf-claims/105458458
minus-squarepinball_wizard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up5·23 hours ago And the lab issuing the fake results is based in the US :( Of course it is. :(
minus-squareMDCCCLV@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·24 hours agoThe metal oxide kind was fine but had some non effectiveness issues about damaging marine coral. The other kinds are less reliable.
minus-squarejumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down3·23 hours agomarine coral matters less than my skin
minus-squareMDCCCLV@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoObviously with the caveat that it doesn’t matter if you’re not going in the ocean.
minus-squarebaines@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoyou realize that’s how it works right?
minus-squarejumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·11 hours agowhen that happens we can fill them with oil
It’s better than scientifically proven! They made cute videos out of it! Isn’t that obviously more trustworthy?
you know what else was scientifically proven to work?
sunscreen and yet corporations still managed to find a ways to fuck consumers on that
I’m not saying you shouldn’t listen to actual experts, but lets not pretend even that is for sure safe
and now how do you even check if something has side effects, AI slop will probably tell you to heat kitty in the microwave to remove fleas
What’s wrong with sunscreen?
There’s nothing wrong with sunscreen in general, but they are probably referring to what happened recently in Australia:
And the lab issuing the fake results is based in the US :(
Of course it is. :(
The metal oxide kind was fine but had some non effectiveness issues about damaging marine coral. The other kinds are less reliable.
marine coral matters less than my skin
until our oceans collapse
Obviously with the caveat that it doesn’t matter if you’re not going in the ocean.
you realize that’s how it works right?
when that happens we can fill them with oil