misk@piefed.social to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 14 days agoGoogle Not Required to Sell Chrome in Court Antitrust Rulingwww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up128arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up127arrow-down1external-linkGoogle Not Required to Sell Chrome in Court Antitrust Rulingwww.bloomberg.commisk@piefed.social to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square5fedilinkfile-text
Archive: https://archive.ph/2025.09.02-212946/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-02/google-not-required-to-sell-chrome-in-court-antitrust-ruling
minus-squareMCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·13 days agoDoes this mean that Mozilla will continue to receive money from Google?
minus-squareYozul@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days agoThat’s a separate point in the same case, but yes. The judge also ruled to allow google to keep paying for search engine placement.
minus-squarecryptiod137@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days agoThey ruled that they are still allowed to pay at least, so I assume it will keep going https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2025/09/google-antitrust-ruling-firefox-search-deal
Does this mean that Mozilla will continue to receive money from Google?
That’s a separate point in the same case, but yes. The judge also ruled to allow google to keep paying for search engine placement.
They ruled that they are still allowed to pay at least, so I assume it will keep going
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2025/09/google-antitrust-ruling-firefox-search-deal