Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered entertainment destination. Lift your spirits with funny jokes, trending memes, entertaining gifs, inspiring stories, viral videos, and so much more from users.
That’s one way to hide AI video. I don’t know about the cat being wet but the ground doesn’t look wet either when it comes out. Again maybe it’s real but I hate that these days one has to be skeptical about random videos.
Play the last half second of the video paused, then switch to the beginning and you can see the thin line of wet created by the cats passing disappear. Looks like a weak shadow, but definitely there.
I could go I to the physics of how water falls off a cats chest, to the thin point created by fur, but it’s a cat video and the fun of it is starting to escape.
The fun escaped when a single doofus suggested (“asked”) if it was AI.
Such comments without any hint of evidence should result in a ban.
Otherwise, posting content of any kind will decrease, approaching zero.
Wtf? So commenting “Is this video AI” (clearly a question) is now an accusation?
And on top of that it should result in the user banned???
If you didn’t like a thread like this because it “ruins the fun” you can collapse it, but you don’t get to control people’s speech depending on how you personally like it.
And even if it does really ruin the fun, I don’t see a rule against that. And asking that question certainly doesn’t break the “Be respectful” rule.
If anything I found this thread informative because of the responses to the initial comment.
Why is the cat not wet after leaving the pool?
It is, there just are too few pixels
That’s one way to hide AI video. I don’t know about the cat being wet but the ground doesn’t look wet either when it comes out. Again maybe it’s real but I hate that these days one has to be skeptical about random videos.
The ground is wet though. You CAN see it.
I personally cannot see it at all but I am not claiming it’s not there. The only thing I can see for sure it’s pixels.
Play the last half second of the video paused, then switch to the beginning and you can see the thin line of wet created by the cats passing disappear. Looks like a weak shadow, but definitely there.
I could go I to the physics of how water falls off a cats chest, to the thin point created by fur, but it’s a cat video and the fun of it is starting to escape.
The fun escaped when a single doofus suggested (“asked”) if it was AI.
Such comments without any hint of evidence should result in a ban.
Otherwise, posting content of any kind will decrease, approaching zero.
Wtf? So commenting “Is this video AI” (clearly a question) is now an accusation?
And on top of that it should result in the user banned???
If you didn’t like a thread like this because it “ruins the fun” you can collapse it, but you don’t get to control people’s speech depending on how you personally like it.
And even if it does really ruin the fun, I don’t see a rule against that. And asking that question certainly doesn’t break the “Be respectful” rule.
If anything I found this thread informative because of the responses to the initial comment.
Bot?
root level comment wasn’t a question, it was a statement