We agree that AI has its uses and can be the correct tool for (many!) jobs.
You don’t see potential dangers in trusting a machine with acceleration and breaking? Tesla is screaming that you should.
I think there definitely are dangers, in the wrong hands. For my own personal experience, I use this technology, but I don’t trust it. That’s why I’m always vigilant, and I never fully let myself not pay attention to the road. Always keep my hands on the wheel and pedals if need be. The danger lies in people trusting these immature technologies (too much or at all).
I don’t know what Tesla says, I don’t pay attention to them because I don’t drive Tesla.
Anyway, one technology is touted as intelligent, and gives you answers. The other is marketed as a tool that can increase security, but with a huge disclaimer that the driver is always responsible for keeping an eye on the road and managing the breaks when necessary. (This is Volvo btw.)
It is luddite though.
Alright, call it whatever you want to call it. I don’t know if labelling makes any difference to our argumentation here. Both of our points still stand. All I was trying to say is that I’m not opposed AI for being afraid of the unknown or something, but because I know how it works and that’s what makes me hesitant to use it. AI makes mistakes, and teaches people bullshit with confidence. As well as all those other things you ignored.
But if we find a way to take out the human part of its inputs, then AI can be a really strong tool. Then I might consider using it for more things. But I still like to stay analog for some things, because living a more analog life I think is better and healthier for people in general.
If we rely on computers to make even basic day-to-day decisions for us, we are headed down a path that seems unhealthy. Like I said, it wouldn’t be conducive to independent thought.
I think we mostly agree, at least we don’t disgree on anything substantive. Except the last fear mongery paragraph. My grouchy math teacher said the same sort of things about pocket calculators. Here we have another calculator, quite literally, and the same sort of arguments being made.
I didn’t mean listen to what Tesla says, but listen to what they do. They had a problem killing cruiser motorcyclists because the two break lights low to the ground they have resembles a car far away. Anyway, my own luddite problems with car tech aside. It’s not a reason for you to stop using it, nor would I try convince you.
My main problem is with the anti-AI people, for the reasons I’ve already gone over. Grouchy math teacher arguments aren’t convincing. Anti-capitalist arguments aren’t an argument against AI but capitalism. The ethical arguments (deep fakes) are half convincing but could be handled legislatively.
When you imply that I am a fear mongerer, and grouchy, that honestly turns me off of this conversation. I’m not interested in these passive-aggressive ad hominems. I don’t know if you realize your rudeness, but sir, please.
Your wording also implies that you generalize me as/among “anti-AI ‘people’”. I’m not anti-AI. You lean heavily on the “old geezer against tech” argument, but that’s not what’s going on here and you won’t hear otherwise. I’m not even 40, bro.
You’ve been borderline civil here, so you know.
I know you’ve heard some of my arguments and I thank you for acknowledging those. I’ve heard yours as well, I hope you take my word for it. But this is where I’m done. I wish you luck in using AI, and have a good day. Peace.
We agree that AI has its uses and can be the correct tool for (many!) jobs.
I think there definitely are dangers, in the wrong hands. For my own personal experience, I use this technology, but I don’t trust it. That’s why I’m always vigilant, and I never fully let myself not pay attention to the road. Always keep my hands on the wheel and pedals if need be. The danger lies in people trusting these immature technologies (too much or at all).
I don’t know what Tesla says, I don’t pay attention to them because I don’t drive Tesla.
Anyway, one technology is touted as intelligent, and gives you answers. The other is marketed as a tool that can increase security, but with a huge disclaimer that the driver is always responsible for keeping an eye on the road and managing the breaks when necessary. (This is Volvo btw.)
Alright, call it whatever you want to call it. I don’t know if labelling makes any difference to our argumentation here. Both of our points still stand. All I was trying to say is that I’m not opposed AI for being afraid of the unknown or something, but because I know how it works and that’s what makes me hesitant to use it. AI makes mistakes, and teaches people bullshit with confidence. As well as all those other things you ignored.
But if we find a way to take out the human part of its inputs, then AI can be a really strong tool. Then I might consider using it for more things. But I still like to stay analog for some things, because living a more analog life I think is better and healthier for people in general.
If we rely on computers to make even basic day-to-day decisions for us, we are headed down a path that seems unhealthy. Like I said, it wouldn’t be conducive to independent thought.
I think we mostly agree, at least we don’t disgree on anything substantive. Except the last fear mongery paragraph. My grouchy math teacher said the same sort of things about pocket calculators. Here we have another calculator, quite literally, and the same sort of arguments being made.
I didn’t mean listen to what Tesla says, but listen to what they do. They had a problem killing cruiser motorcyclists because the two break lights low to the ground they have resembles a car far away. Anyway, my own luddite problems with car tech aside. It’s not a reason for you to stop using it, nor would I try convince you.
My main problem is with the anti-AI people, for the reasons I’ve already gone over. Grouchy math teacher arguments aren’t convincing. Anti-capitalist arguments aren’t an argument against AI but capitalism. The ethical arguments (deep fakes) are half convincing but could be handled legislatively.
When you imply that I am a fear mongerer, and grouchy, that honestly turns me off of this conversation. I’m not interested in these passive-aggressive ad hominems. I don’t know if you realize your rudeness, but sir, please.
Your wording also implies that you generalize me as/among “anti-AI ‘people’”. I’m not anti-AI. You lean heavily on the “old geezer against tech” argument, but that’s not what’s going on here and you won’t hear otherwise. I’m not even 40, bro.
You’ve been borderline civil here, so you know.
I know you’ve heard some of my arguments and I thank you for acknowledging those. I’ve heard yours as well, I hope you take my word for it. But this is where I’m done. I wish you luck in using AI, and have a good day. Peace.