• outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Yes. It is that thing. Gotta have a gulag committee.

    Edit: oh my fuck i thought that was sarcasm, do people really not even think of just not doing the atrocity bad thing ever, just not ever buildibg and maintaining that capacity?

    Like, i don’t have a process for deciding which neighbors I’m going to vivisect while they have a bad drug trip and are sexually assaulted in new and horrible ways before i throw them into my dungeon where i do psychological sadism to them and chop bits off until there’s nothing left but some mostly denatured cardiac muscle and a spine.

    Would be fucking creepy if i did. I hope none of my neighbors spend a second on thinking of doing that to me. It woukd be, perhaos, profoundly disturbing if anyone ever seriously considered, or even fantasized about, doing this to me. You understand that, right? Right?

    • NoFun4You@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Would you rather a gulag committee or no gulag committee lol. Ppl want children to spend their whole life’s in prison for making mistakes before their brain is fully developed… I’d say a committee is a much better compromise than letting agents like that represent immigration-or whatever the fuck they’re doing in the us-to make decisions.

      • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The thought of just not having a gulag, of taking that option off the table entirely, genuinely does not occur to you?

        Assuming a true statement, the last line in OP adds people to the torture prison